[question] Why newer QEMU may lose irq when doing migration?

2014-12-16 Thread Wincy Van
Hi, all: The patchset (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/18/309) fixed migration of Windows guests, but commit 0bc830b05c667218d703f2026ec866c49df974fc (KVM: ioapic: clear IRR for edge-triggered interrupts at delivery) introduced a bug (see https://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg109813.htm

Re: [question] Why newer QEMU may lose irq when doing migration?

2014-12-18 Thread Wincy Van
2014-12-17 18:46 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini : > > > On 17/12/2014 04:46, Wincy Van wrote: >> Hi, all: >> >> The patchset (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/18/309) fixed migration of >> Windows guests, but commit 0bc830b05c667218d703f2026ec866c49df974fc >> (KVM: ioapic: clear IRR for edge-triggered interru

Re: [question] Why newer QEMU may lose irq when doing migration?

2014-12-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 19/12/2014 04:58, Wincy Van wrote: > 2014-12-17 18:46 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini : >> >> >> On 17/12/2014 04:46, Wincy Van wrote: >>> Hi, all: >>> >>> The patchset (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/18/309) fixed migration of >>> Windows guests, but commit 0bc830b05c667218d703f2026ec866c49df974fc >>>

Re: [question] Why newer QEMU may lose irq when doing migration?

2014-12-22 Thread Wincy Van
2014-12-19 17:50 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini : > > > On 19/12/2014 04:58, Wincy Van wrote: >> 2014-12-17 18:46 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini : >>> >>> >>> On 17/12/2014 04:46, Wincy Van wrote: Hi, all: The patchset (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/18/309) fixed migration of Windows guests, b

Re: [question] Why newer QEMU may lose irq when doing migration?

2014-12-17 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 17/12/2014 04:46, Wincy Van wrote: > Hi, all: > > The patchset (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/18/309) fixed migration of > Windows guests, but commit 0bc830b05c667218d703f2026ec866c49df974fc > (KVM: ioapic: clear IRR for edge-triggered interrupts at delivery) > introduced a bug (see > https://