On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 21:32 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Hello Joerg,
>
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> >> May I please ask, if you meanwhile could get any information about
> >> potential peer-to-peer communica
Hello Joerg,
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> May I please ask, if you meanwhile could get any information about
>> potential peer-to-peer communication between the functions of the
>> following multifunction device:
>
> G
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> May I please ask, if you meanwhile could get any information about
> potential peer-to-peer communication between the functions of the
> following multifunction device:
Good news: I actually found the right person to
Hello Joerg,
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:27:05AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> Joerg, the question is whether the multifunction device above allows
>> peer-to-peer between functions that could bypass the iommu. If not, we
>> can make it the first entry in device specific a
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:55:55AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Hello Joerg,
>
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:27:05AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> Joerg, the question is whether the multifunction device above allows
> >> peer-to-peer between functions that could byp
Hello Joerg,
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:27:05AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> Joerg, the question is whether the multifunction device above allows
>> peer-to-peer between functions that could bypass the iommu. If not, we
>> can make it the first entry in device specific a
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:39:30 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 10:12 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:55:42 +0200
> > Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> >
> > > Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfi
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 10:12 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:55:42 +0200
> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>
> > Alex Williamson wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfio_iommu_type1
> > > with allow_unsafe_interrupts=1 will solve it.
> >
> >
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:27:05AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Joerg, the question is whether the multifunction device above allows
> peer-to-peer between functions that could bypass the iommu. If not, we
> can make it the first entry in device specific acs enabled function I
> proposed:
>
>
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:12:27 +0200
> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:55:42 +0200
>> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>
>>> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> [...]
Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfio_iommu_type1
with allow_unsafe_inter
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:12:27 +0200
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:55:42 +0200
> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>
> > Alex Williamson wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfio_iommu_type1
> > > with allow_unsafe_interrupts=1 will solve it.
> >
>
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:55:42 +0200
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:
> [...]
> > Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfio_iommu_type1
> > with allow_unsafe_interrupts=1 will solve it.
>
> Yes! Works now. Success!
>
> Works means: Device is seen in VM. I could
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 22:31 -0500, Chris Sanders wrote:
> > Great, glad to hear it. You can expect performance to get better once
> > we get this upstream. Interrupts are currently getting bounced through
> > Qemu which adds overhead. Eventually we'll accelerate them through KVM.
> > I'm still a
> Great, glad to hear it. You can expect performance to get better once
> we get this upstream. Interrupts are currently getting bounced through
> Qemu which adds overhead. Eventually we'll accelerate them through KVM.
> I'm still able to play static directly from the device using mplayer, so
>
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 22:07 -0500, Chris Sanders wrote:
> Alex,
>
> This solution appears to be working for me as well on a GA-970-D3.
>
> I've been able to pass the Hauppauge 350 through to a Windows XP guest
> which has installed drivers and loaded it into my recording software
> (SageTV). I'v
Alex,
This solution appears to be working for me as well on a GA-970-D3.
I've been able to pass the Hauppauge 350 through to a Windows XP guest
which has installed drivers and loaded it into my recording software
(SageTV). I've got a few more things I want to clean up on my qemu
start command bu
test
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Andreas Hartmann
wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> thanks for your efforts!
>
> Maybe, you already know that I'm suffering the same problem :-( with a
> GA-990XA-UD3 (990X chipset).
>
>
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:44:05 -0600
> Alex Williamson wrote:
> [...]
>> I have a
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 22:37 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:55 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Alex Williamson wrote:
[...]
> Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfio_iommu_type1
> with
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 22:37 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:55 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> >> Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfio_iommu_type1
> >>> with allow_unsafe_interrupts=1
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:55 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> Alex Williamson wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfio_iommu_type1
>>> with allow_unsafe_interrupts=1 will solve it.
>>
>> Yes! Works now. Success!
>>
>> Works means: De
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:55 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:
> [...]
> > Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfio_iommu_type1
> > with allow_unsafe_interrupts=1 will solve it.
>
> Yes! Works now. Success!
>
> Works means: Device is seen in VM. I couldn'
Alex Williamson wrote:
[...]
> Yep, I think the previous suggestion about reloading vfio_iommu_type1
> with allow_unsafe_interrupts=1 will solve it.
Yes! Works now. Success!
Works means: Device is seen in VM. I couldn't test it up to now, because
I don't have any driver in the VM for this dev
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 17:58 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> [...]
> > I tried to run qemu-system-x86_64 but got this error on startup:
> >
> > qemu-system-x86_64: -device
> > vfio-pci,host=06:07.0,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5: vfio: failed to set
> > iommu for contai
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
[...]
> I tried to run qemu-system-x86_64 but got this error on startup:
>
> qemu-system-x86_64: -device
> vfio-pci,host=06:07.0,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5: vfio: failed to set
> iommu for container: Operation not permitted
>
> qemu-system-x86_64: -device
> vfio-pci
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 17:17 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:27:05 -0600
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 12:39 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > > Hello Alex,
> > >
> > > thanks for your efforts!
> > >
> > > Maybe, you already know that I'm suffering
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:27:05 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 12:39 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > Hello Alex,
> >
> > thanks for your efforts!
> >
> > Maybe, you already know that I'm suffering the same problem :-( with a
> > GA-990XA-UD3 (990X chipset).
>
> My system
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 12:39 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> thanks for your efforts!
>
> Maybe, you already know that I'm suffering the same problem :-( with a
> GA-990XA-UD3 (990X chipset).
My system is a GA-990FXA-UD3, so just a slightly different version of
the chipset.
> On
Hello Alex,
thanks for your efforts!
Maybe, you already know that I'm suffering the same problem :-( with a
GA-990XA-UD3 (990X chipset).
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:44:05 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
[...]
> I have a setup with an AMD 990FX system and a spare PVR-350 card that I
> installed to repr
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 16:11 -0500, Chris Sanders wrote:
> Hello, I've been working for several days trying to get Pci
> Passthrough to work. So far the #kvm IRC channel has helped me with a
> few suggestions, though that hasn't yet solved the problem. I'm
> running CentOS 6.2 and was suggested I
29 matches
Mail list logo
