Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:00:49PM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
I just test your new patch with Windows 2008 DataCenter at my
platform, it works OK! We can hot-add new cpus and they appear at
Device Manager. (BTW, yesterday I test your new patch with linux
2.6.32 hvm, it
; You, Yongkang
Subject: Re: Alt SeaBIOS SSDT cpu hotplug
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 07:13:34PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/02/2010 06:55 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:12:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.08.2010, at 07:49, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:00:49PM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
I just test your new patch with Windows 2008 DataCenter at my
platform, it works OK! We can hot-add new cpus and they appear at
Device Manager. (BTW, yesterday I test your new patch with linux
2.6.32 hvm, it works fine, we can
On 02.08.2010, at 07:49, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:41:39AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Kevin,
This patch still has issue, It can boot Windows 2008 DataCenter,
however, when run cpu_set cpu online command, windows 2008
Datacenter system shutdown at once.
Thanks for
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:12:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.08.2010, at 07:49, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:41:39AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
It seems the Windows acpi interpreter is significantly different from
the Linux one. The only guess I have is that
On 02.08.2010, at 17:55, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:12:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.08.2010, at 07:49, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:41:39AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
It seems the Windows acpi interpreter is significantly different from
On 02.08.2010, at 18:13, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/02/2010 06:55 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:12:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.08.2010, at 07:49, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:41:39AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
It seems the Windows acpi
On 08/02/2010 06:55 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:12:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.08.2010, at 07:49, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:41:39AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
It seems the Windows acpi interpreter is significantly different from
the
SSDT cpu hotplug
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 07:13:34PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/02/2010 06:55 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:12:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.08.2010, at 07:49, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:41:39AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong
Kevin,
This patch still has issue,
It can boot Windows 2008 DataCenter, however,
when run cpu_set cpu online command, windows 2008 Datacenter system shutdown
at once.
Thanks,
Jinsong
Sorry about that. It looks like I messed up the SSDT ScopeOp length.
New patch attached below. I've
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:41:39AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Kevin,
This patch still has issue, It can boot Windows 2008 DataCenter,
however, when run cpu_set cpu online command, windows 2008
Datacenter system shutdown at once.
Thanks for testing.
I've inspected the generated DSDT and
Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:41:18AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:19:13PM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Very nice. I thought about doing this but abandoned it as
unmaintainable. Using
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 01:22:59AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:41:18AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
I've tested this under linux - there were a few bugs in the
previous patch. I also had to replace
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:41:18AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:19:13PM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Very nice. I thought about doing this but abandoned it as
unmaintainable. Using external functions and the ID variable,
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:41:18AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:19:13PM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Very nice. I thought about doing this but abandoned it as
unmaintainable. Using external functions and
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:41:18AM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
I've tested this under linux - there were a few bugs in the previous
patch. I also had to replace the dynamically created CPUS array with
a dynamically created NTFY method - which is a bit more complicated.
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:45:06PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 03:54:10PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 07:26:07PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:22:49PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:57:05AM
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:19:13PM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Very nice. I thought about doing this but abandoned it as
unmaintainable. Using external functions and the ID variable,
however, reduces the mess to tolerable proportions, and gains us a
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 07:26:07PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:22:49PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:57:05AM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
The CPUS package stores references to the Processor objects, and the
CPON package stores the state
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/07/2010 07:57 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing with the cpu hotplug SSDT changes. Attached is a
proposal for an alternative method of adding ACPI support.
The idea is to continue to build a dynamic SSDT based on CountCPUs
and MaxCountCPUs. The
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 03:54:10PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 07:26:07PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:22:49PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:57:05AM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
The CPUS package stores references
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:19:13PM +0800, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Very nice. I thought about doing this but abandoned it as
unmaintainable. Using external functions and the ID variable,
however, reduces the mess to tolerable proportions, and gains us a
lot of flexibility.
On 07/07/2010 07:57 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing with the cpu hotplug SSDT changes. Attached is a
proposal for an alternative method of adding ACPI support.
The idea is to continue to build a dynamic SSDT based on CountCPUs and
MaxCountCPUs. The dynamic SSDT entries just
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:57:05AM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing with the cpu hotplug SSDT changes. Attached is a
proposal for an alternative method of adding ACPI support.
The idea is to continue to build a dynamic SSDT based on CountCPUs and
MaxCountCPUs. The
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:22:49PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:57:05AM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
The CPUS package stores references to the Processor objects, and the
CPON package stores the state of which cpus are active. With this
info, hopefully there is no
Hi,
I've been playing with the cpu hotplug SSDT changes. Attached is a
proposal for an alternative method of adding ACPI support.
The idea is to continue to build a dynamic SSDT based on CountCPUs and
MaxCountCPUs. The dynamic SSDT entries just call methods in the main
DSDT.
This is
26 matches
Mail list logo
