Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 20:28 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Can you please try the following
Thanks Marcelo, this seems to fix it. I tested up to a 30G guest with
large pages.
I've applied the patch, thanks. I keep thinking we need to do
additional
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 20:28 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Can you please try the following
Thanks Marcelo, this seems to fix it. I tested up to a 30G guest with
large pages.
Alex
--
qemu: kvm: fixup 4GB+ memslot large page alignment
Need to align the 4GB+ memslot after we know
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:57:46PM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Alex Williamson alex.william...@hp.com [2009-03-24 16:07]:
On a 2.6.29, x86_64 host/guest, what's special about specifying a guest
size of -m 3586 when using -mem-path backed by hugetlbfs? 3585 works,
3586 hangs here:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:57:46PM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Alex Williamson alex.william...@hp.com [2009-03-24 16:07]:
On a 2.6.29, x86_64 host/guest, what's special about specifying a guest
size of -m 3586 when using -mem-path backed by hugetlbfs? 3585 works,
3586 hangs here:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 13:10 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:57:46PM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Alex Williamson alex.william...@hp.com [2009-03-24 16:07]:
On a 2.6.29, x86_64 host/guest, what's special about specifying a guest
size of -m 3586 when using
On a 2.6.29, x86_64 host/guest, what's special about specifying a guest
size of -m 3586 when using -mem-path backed by hugetlbfs? 3585 works,
3586 hangs here:
...
PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
Placing 64MB software IO TLB between 88002000 - 88002400
* Alex Williamson alex.william...@hp.com [2009-03-24 16:07]:
On a 2.6.29, x86_64 host/guest, what's special about specifying a guest
size of -m 3586 when using -mem-path backed by hugetlbfs? 3585 works,
3586 hangs here:
...
PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
