Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Apr 5

2011-04-08 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:58:22AM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:03 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues > > wrote: > > >> Perhaps kvm-autotest is a good platform for the automated testing of > > >> ARM TCG.

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Apr 5

2011-04-08 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:03 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues > wrote: > > Thanks for your detailed response! > > > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 16:29 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >> * Public notifications of breakage, qemu.git/master failures

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Apr 5

2011-04-07 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: Thanks for your detailed response! > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 16:29 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> * Public notifications of breakage, qemu.git/master failures to >> qemu-devel mailing list. > > ^ The challenge is to get enough data

Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5]

2011-04-06 Thread Alon Levy
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:03:00PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 20:08 +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:27:48PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 19:01 +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > > > > > > So I was basically talk

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5]

2011-04-05 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 04/05/2011 01:25 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:08 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote: The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have al

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5]

2011-04-05 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:08 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote: > > > >> The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination > >> program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have > >> all infrastructure in place there. If we

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5]

2011-04-05 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote: The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have all infrastructure in place there. If we need graphical clients being started and controlled on a linux bare metal m

Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5]

2011-04-05 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 20:08 +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:27:48PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 19:01 +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > > > > So I was basically talking about the added requirement of creating a > > > client > > > connection (one or

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Apr 5

2011-04-05 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 16:29 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > Features that I think are important for a qemu.git kvm-autotest: > * Public results display (sounds like you're working on this) ^ Yes, we hope to get this setup soon. > * Public notifications of breakage, qemu.git/master failures to >

Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5]

2011-04-05 Thread Alon Levy
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:27:48PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 19:01 +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > > screenshots are already there, and they are a great start. But you can't > > really do testing if you aren't recreating the same environment, and having > > a client s

Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5]

2011-04-05 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 19:01 +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > screenshots are already there, and they are a great start. But you can't > really do testing if you aren't recreating the same environment, and having > a client server where there is no client, while being a good test, doesn't > cover the case

spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5]

2011-04-05 Thread Alon Levy
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:07:03AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: [snip] > kvm-autotest > - roadmap...refactor to centralize testing (handle the xen-autotest split off) > - internally at RH, lmr and cleber maintain autotest server to test > branches (testing qemu.git daily) > - have good automation

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Apr 5

2011-04-05 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Chris Wright wrote: > kvm-autotest > - roadmap...refactor to centralize testing (handle the xen-autotest split off) > - internally at RH, lmr and cleber maintain autotest server to test >  branches (testing qemu.git daily) >  - have good automation for installs and

KVM call minutes for Apr 5

2011-04-05 Thread Chris Wright
KVM Forum - save the date is out, cfp will follow later this week - abstracts due in 6wks, 2wk review period, notifications by end of May Improving process to scale project - Trivial patch bot - Sub-maintainership Trivial patch monkeys^Wteam - small/simple patches posted can fall through the crac