On 08/20/2011 04:16 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
Author: Alexander Duyck alexander.h.du...@intel.com
Date: Thu Jul 1 13:28:27 2010 +
x86: Drop CONFIG_MCORE2 check around setting of NET_IP_ALIGN
This patch removes the CONFIG_MCORE2 check from around
NET_IP_ALIGN. It is
based on
Le lundi 22 août 2011 à 09:36 +0300, Avi Kivity a écrit :
On 08/20/2011 04:16 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
Author: Alexander Duyck alexander.h.du...@intel.com
Date: Thu Jul 1 13:28:27 2010 +
x86: Drop CONFIG_MCORE2 check around setting of NET_IP_ALIGN
This patch removes the
On 07/06/11 21:37, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 07 juin 2011 à 21:27 +0800, Brad Campbell a écrit :
On 07/06/11 04:22, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Could you please try latest linux-2.6 tree ?
We fixed many networking bugs that could explain your crash.
No good I'm afraid.
[ 543.040056]
On 06/10/2011 05:52 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
At one point I would have need an 8000km long wire to the reset switch :-)
Even more off-topic, there has been a case when a 200,000,000 km long
wire to the reset button was needed. IIRC they got away with a watchdog.
--
error compiling
On 11-06-09 10:52 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:02:13AM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 08/06/11 11:59, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Well, a bisection definitely should help, but needs a lot of time in
your case.
Yes. compile, test, crash, walk out to the other building to press
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Mark Lord wrote:
Something many of us don't realize is that nearly all Intel chipsets
have a built-in hardware watchdog timer. This includes chipset for
consumer desktop boards as well as the big iron server stuff.
It's the i8xx_tco driver in the kernel enables use of
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:02:13AM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 08/06/11 11:59, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Well, a bisection definitely should help, but needs a lot of time in
your case.
Yes. compile, test, crash, walk out to the other building to press
reset, lather, rinse, repeat.
I need
On 08/06/11 11:59, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Well, a bisection definitely should help, but needs a lot of time in
your case.
Yes. compile, test, crash, walk out to the other building to press
reset, lather, rinse, repeat.
I need a reset button on the end of a 50M wire, or a hardware watchdog!
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 01:02 +0800, Brad Campbell a écrit :
On 08/06/11 11:59, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Well, a bisection definitely should help, but needs a lot of time in
your case.
Yes. compile, test, crash, walk out to the other building to press
reset, lather, rinse, repeat.
I need
On 07/06/11 04:22, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Could you please try latest linux-2.6 tree ?
We fixed many networking bugs that could explain your crash.
No good I'm afraid.
[ 543.040056]
=
[ 543.040136] BUG
On 07.06.2011 05:33, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 07/06/11 04:10, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
Hi Brad,
This has probably nothing to do with ebtables, so please rmmod in case
it's loaded.
A few questions I didn't directly see an answer to in the threads I
scanned...
I'm assuming you actually use the
Le mardi 07 juin 2011 à 21:27 +0800, Brad Campbell a écrit :
On 07/06/11 04:22, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Could you please try latest linux-2.6 tree ?
We fixed many networking bugs that could explain your crash.
No good I'm afraid.
[ 543.040056]
On 07/06/11 21:30, Patrick McHardy wrote:
On 07.06.2011 05:33, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 07/06/11 04:10, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
Hi Brad,
This has probably nothing to do with ebtables, so please rmmod in case
it's loaded.
A few questions I didn't directly see an answer to in the threads I
On 07.06.2011 16:40, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 07/06/11 21:30, Patrick McHardy wrote:
On 07.06.2011 05:33, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 07/06/11 04:10, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
Hi Brad,
This has probably nothing to do with ebtables, so please rmmod in case
it's loaded.
A few questions I didn't
Op 7/06/2011 16:40, Brad Campbell schreef:
On 07/06/11 21:30, Patrick McHardy wrote:
On 07.06.2011 05:33, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 07/06/11 04:10, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
Hi Brad,
This has probably nothing to do with ebtables, so please rmmod in case
it's loaded.
A few questions I didn't
Le mardi 07 juin 2011 à 17:35 +0200, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
The main suspects would be NAT and TCPMSS. Did you also try whether
the crash occurs with only one of these these rules?
I've just compiled out CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER and can no longer access
the address the way I was doing
On 07.06.2011 20:31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 07 juin 2011 à 17:35 +0200, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
The main suspects would be NAT and TCPMSS. Did you also try whether
the crash occurs with only one of these these rules?
I've just compiled out CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER and can no longer
On 08/06/11 02:04, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
If the bug is easily triggered with your guest os, then you could try to
capture the traffic with wireshark (or something else) in a
configuration that doesn't crash your system. Save the traffic in a pcap
file. Then you can see if resending that
On 08/06/11 06:57, Patrick McHardy wrote:
On 07.06.2011 20:31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 07 juin 2011 à 17:35 +0200, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
The main suspects would be NAT and TCPMSS. Did you also try whether
the crash occurs with only one of these these rules?
I've just compiled out
On 07/06/11 23:35, Patrick McHardy wrote:
The main suspects would be NAT and TCPMSS. Did you also try whether
the crash occurs with only one of these these rules?
To be honest I'm actually having trouble finding where TCPMSS is
actually set in that ruleset. This is a production machine so I
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 08:18 +0800, Brad Campbell a écrit :
On 08/06/11 06:57, Patrick McHardy wrote:
On 07.06.2011 20:31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 07 juin 2011 à 17:35 +0200, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
The main suspects would be NAT and TCPMSS. Did you also try whether
the crash
Hi Brad,
This has probably nothing to do with ebtables, so please rmmod in case
it's loaded.
A few questions I didn't directly see an answer to in the threads I
scanned...
I'm assuming you actually use the bridging firewall functionality. So,
what iptables modules do you use? Can you reduce
Le dimanche 05 juin 2011 à 21:45 +0800, Brad Campbell a écrit :
On 05/06/11 16:14, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/03/2011 04:38 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
Is there anyone who can point me at the appropriate cage to rattle? I
know it appears to be a netfilter issue, but I don't seem to be able
to
Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 22:10 +0200, Bart De Schuymer a écrit :
Hi Brad,
This has probably nothing to do with ebtables, so please rmmod in case
it's loaded.
A few questions I didn't directly see an answer to in the threads I
scanned...
I'm assuming you actually use the bridging firewall
On 07/06/11 04:10, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
Hi Brad,
This has probably nothing to do with ebtables, so please rmmod in case
it's loaded.
A few questions I didn't directly see an answer to in the threads I
scanned...
I'm assuming you actually use the bridging firewall functionality. So,
what
On 06/03/2011 04:38 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
Is there anyone who can point me at the appropriate cage to rattle? I
know it appears to be a netfilter issue, but I don't seem to be able
to get a message to the list (and I am subscribed to it and have been
getting mail for months) and I'm not
On 05/06/11 16:14, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/03/2011 04:38 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
Is there anyone who can point me at the appropriate cage to rattle? I
know it appears to be a netfilter issue, but I don't seem to be able
to get a message to the list (and I am subscribed to it and have been
On 06/05/2011 04:45 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
The mailing list might be set not to send your own mails back to you.
Check the list archive.
Yep, I did that first..
Given the response to previous issues along the same line, it looks a
bit like I just remember not to actually use the system in
On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere
in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge).
All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP
Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell:
On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere
in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge).
All of the nat/dnat
On 03/06/11 23:50, Bernhard Held wrote:
Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell:
On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere
in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not
On 01/06/11 12:52, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I guess Brad could try SLUB debugging, boot with slub_debug=P
for poisoning perhaps; though it might upset alignments and
drive the problem underground. Or see if the same happens
with SLAB instead of SLUB.
Not much use I'm afraid.
This is all I get in
On 06/01/2011 09:31 AM, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 01/06/11 12:52, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I guess Brad could try SLUB debugging, boot with slub_debug=P
for poisoning perhaps; though it might upset alignments and
drive the problem underground. Or see if the same happens
with SLAB instead of SLUB.
On 06/01/2011 12:29 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 01/06/11 14:56, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/01/2011 09:31 AM, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 01/06/11 12:52, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I guess Brad could try SLUB debugging, boot with slub_debug=P
for poisoning perhaps; though it might upset alignments and
On 06/01/2011 12:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
bridge and netfilter, IIRC this was also the problem last time.
Do you have any ebtables loaded?
Can you try building a kernel without ebtables? Without netfilter at
all?
Please run all tests with slub_debug=FZPU.
--
error compiling
On 01/06/11 17:41, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/01/2011 12:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
bridge and netfilter, IIRC this was also the problem last time.
Do you have any ebtables loaded?
Never heard of them, but making a cursory check just in case..
brad@srv:/raid10/src/linux-2.6.39$ grep EBTABLE
On 06/01/2011 01:53 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 01/06/11 17:41, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/01/2011 12:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
bridge and netfilter, IIRC this was also the problem last time.
Do you have any ebtables loaded?
Never heard of them, but making a cursory check just in case..
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 06:53:31PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
I rebooted into a netfilter kernel, and did all the steps I'd used
on the no-netfilter kernel and it ticked along happily.
So the result of the experiment is inconclusive. Having said that,
the backtraces certainly smell
On 01/06/11 19:18, CaT wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 06:53:31PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
I rebooted into a netfilter kernel, and did all the steps I'd used
on the no-netfilter kernel and it ticked along happily.
So the result of the experiment is inconclusive. Having said that,
the
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere
in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge).
All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP addresses.
Damn. Not referencing
On 31/05/11 13:47, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Looks like a KSM issue. Disabling CONFIG_KSM should at least stop your
machine from oopsing.
Adding linux-mm.
I initially thought that, so the second panic was produced with KSM
disabled from boot.
echo 0 /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run
If you still
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:26:10PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 31/05/11 13:47, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Looks like a KSM issue. Disabling CONFIG_KSM should at least stop your
machine from oopsing.
Adding linux-mm.
I initially thought that, so the second panic was produced with KSM
On 31/05/11 18:38, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:26:10PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 31/05/11 13:47, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Looks like a KSM issue. Disabling CONFIG_KSM should at least stop your
machine from oopsing.
Adding linux-mm.
I initially thought that, so the
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 31/05/11 18:38, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:26:10PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 31/05/11 13:47, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Looks like a KSM issue. Disabling CONFIG_KSM should at least stop your
machine from oopsing.
On 01/06/11 06:31, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Brad, my suspicion is that in each case the top 16 bits of RDX have been
mysteriously corrupted from to , causing the general protection
faults. I don't understand what that has to do with KSM.
No, nor do I. The panic I reproduced with KSM off
On 01/06/11 06:31, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Brad, my suspicion is that in each case the top 16 bits of RDX have been
mysteriously corrupted from to , causing the general protection
faults. I don't understand what that has to do with KSM.
But it's only a suspicion, because I can't make
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:37:25AM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 01/06/11 06:31, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Brad, my suspicion is that in each case the top 16 bits of RDX have been
mysteriously corrupted from to , causing the general protection
faults. I don't understand what
On 01/06/11 09:15, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:37:25AM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 01/06/11 06:31, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Brad, my suspicion is that in each case the top 16 bits of RDX have been
mysteriously corrupted from to , causing the general
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:37:25AM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 01/06/11 06:31, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Brad, my suspicion is that in each case the top 16 bits of RDX have been
mysteriously corrupted from to , causing the general
G'day all,
I'm running a pretty standard home server
x86_64 Phenom-II 6 Core
16GB DDR 3
I run some virtual machines under that. 3 x Debian 64 Bit, 1 x XP 32
Bit. These run at boot.
When I fire up another XP 32 bit instance and play with it for more than
about 2 minutes, I get the panics
Looks like a KSM issue. Disabling CONFIG_KSM should at least stop your
machine from oopsing.
Adding linux-mm.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:24:03AM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
G'day all,
I'm running a pretty standard home server
x86_64 Phenom-II 6 Core
16GB DDR 3
I run some virtual
51 matches
Mail list logo
