On 08/09/15 09:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 08.09.2015 um 08:05 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>> On 07/09/15 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:04:41 +0200
>>> Alexander Graf wrote:
On 04.09.15 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas
Am 08.09.2015 um 08:05 schrieb Thomas Huth:
> On 07/09/15 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:04:41 +0200
>> Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04.09.15 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>
> Hi all,
>
> now t
On 07/09/15 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:04:41 +0200
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 04.09.15 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas Huth:
Hi all,
now that we get memory hotplugging for the spapr machine on q
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:04:41 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 04.09.15 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas Huth:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> now that we get memory hotplugging for the spapr machine on qemu-ppc,
> >> too, it seems like we easily can
On 04/09/15 12:04, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 04.09.15 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> now that we get memory hotplugging for the spapr machine on qemu-ppc,
>>> too, it seems like we easily can hit the amount of KVM-i
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 12:28 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04/09/15 12:07, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am 04.09.2015 um 12:04 schrieb Alexander Graf:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04.09.15 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>> Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 12:28 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > Maybe some rcu protected scheme that doubles the amount of memslots
> > for
> > each overrun? Yes, that would be good and even reduce the footprint
> > for
> > systems with only a small number of memslots.
>
> Seems like Alex Williamson al
On 04/09/15 12:07, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 04.09.2015 um 12:04 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>>
>>
>> On 04.09.15 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas Huth:
Hi all,
now that we get memory hotplugging for the spapr machine on qemu-ppc
Am 04.09.2015 um 12:04 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>
>
> On 04.09.15 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> now that we get memory hotplugging for the spapr machine on qemu-ppc,
>>> too, it seems like we easily can hit the amount of
On 04.09.15 11:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> now that we get memory hotplugging for the spapr machine on qemu-ppc,
>> too, it seems like we easily can hit the amount of KVM-internal memory
>> slots now ("#define KVM_USER_MEM_SL
Am 04.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>
> Hi all,
>
> now that we get memory hotplugging for the spapr machine on qemu-ppc,
> too, it seems like we easily can hit the amount of KVM-internal memory
> slots now ("#define KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS 32" in
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h). For e
Hi all,
now that we get memory hotplugging for the spapr machine on qemu-ppc,
too, it seems like we easily can hit the amount of KVM-internal memory
slots now ("#define KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS 32" in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h). For example, start
qemu-system-ppc64 with a couple of "-device
12 matches
Mail list logo