Works for me with that patch... I don't know if it's working the way it's
supposed to. I just have a build script that's always used that.
If it doesn't work, maybe we should disable or remove it.
On Monday 29 September 2008 5:00:29 pm Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 29.09.2008, at 23:50, Brian Jac
On 29.09.2008, at 23:50, Brian Jackson wrote:
With your patch, I still can't build with a split kernel source/
object dir.
Don't know if it's a difference of configure options or what. Here's
mine just
in case:
./configure --disable-gfx-check --disable-sdl --with-patched-kernel
--prefix=
With your patch, I still can't build with a split kernel source/object dir.
Don't know if it's a difference of configure options or what. Here's mine just
in case:
./configure --disable-gfx-check --disable-sdl --with-patched-kernel
--prefix=/usr
I needed the attached patch as well.
On Monda
Alexander Graf wrote:
> Any further comments on this? I would really like to see KVM build
> out-of-the-box on SUSE kernels (and kernels built with O= at the same
> time).
>
> Alex
/me, too. And my colleagues @work. We carry around an old hack to build
against SuSE, now waiting for your clean solu
Any further comments on this? I would really like to see KVM build out-
of-the-box on SUSE kernels (and kernels built with O= at the same time).
Alex
On 15.09.2008, at 16:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
KVM as is assumes that the kernel obj dir and the kernel source dir
are at the same location. T
Am 18.09.2008 um 04:12 schrieb "Zhang, Xiantao"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexander Graf wrote:
On Sep 16, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
On Sep 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
KVM as is assumes that the kernel obj dir and t
Alexander Graf wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>
>> Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On Sep 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>>
Alexander Graf wrote:
> KVM as is assumes that the kernel obj dir and the kernel source
> dir are at the same location. Th
On Sep 16, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
On Sep 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
KVM as is assumes that the kernel obj dir and the kernel source dir
are at the same location. This is true for most self-built vanilla
kernels,
On Sep 16, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
KVM as is assumes that the kernel obj dir and the kernel source dir
are at the same location. This is true for most self-built vanilla
kernels, but some distributions split these up (e.g. SUSE).
To keep compatible and ha
Alexander Graf wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>
>> Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> KVM as is assumes that the kernel obj dir and the kernel source dir
>>> are at the same location. This is true for most self-built vanilla
>>> kernels, but some distributions split these up (e
Alexander Graf wrote:
> KVM as is assumes that the kernel obj dir and the kernel source dir
> are at the same location. This is true for most self-built vanilla
> kernels, but some distributions split these up (e.g. SUSE).
> To keep compatible and have users have a good experience on building
> KVM
On Sep 16, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
KVM as is assumes that the kernel obj dir and the kernel source dir
are at the same location. This is true for most self-built vanilla
kernels, but some distributions split these up (e.g. SUSE).
To keep compatible and hav
Alexander Graf wrote:
> KVM as is assumes that the kernel obj dir and the kernel source dir
> are at the same location. This is true for most self-built vanilla
> kernels, but some distributions split these up (e.g. SUSE).
> To keep compatible and have users have a good experience on building
> KVM
13 matches
Mail list logo
