RE: [PATCH 2/2] vmx,svm: Print errors if SVM or VMX were already set

2011-07-04 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Alexander Graf > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 8:42 AM > > > On 05.07.2011, at 01:09, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > Instead of exiting quietly, print an error if the VMX or the SVM bits > > were already set when loading the module. > > > > Having VMX/SVM bits set means that either there is som

RE: [PATCH 2/2] vmx,svm: Print errors if SVM or VMX were already set

2011-07-04 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Sasha Levin > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 7:09 AM > > Instead of exiting quietly, print an error if the VMX or the SVM bits > were already set when loading the module. > > Having VMX/SVM bits set means that either there is someone else doing > hardware virtualization, or that the BIOS is

Re: [PATCH 2/2] vmx,svm: Print errors if SVM or VMX were already set

2011-07-04 Thread Alexander Graf
On 05.07.2011, at 01:09, Sasha Levin wrote: > Instead of exiting quietly, print an error if the VMX or the SVM bits > were already set when loading the module. > > Having VMX/SVM bits set means that either there is someone else doing > hardware virtualization, or that the BIOS is buggy and sets