On 08/01/2013 07:12 PM, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
KVM need to lookup linux pte for getting TLB attributes (WIMGE).
This is similar to how book3s does.
This will be used in follow-up patches.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan
---
v1->v2
- This is a new change in this version
arch/powerpc/include/as
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 16:42 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> KVM need to lookup linux pte for getting TLB attributes (WIMGE).
> This is similar to how book3s does.
> This will be used in follow-up patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan
> ---
> v1->v2
> - This is a new change in this version
>
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 17:58 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> What about 64-bit PTEs on 32-bit kernels?
>
> In any case, this code does not belong in KVM. It should be in the
> main
> PPC mm code, even if KVM is the only user.
Also don't we do similar things in BookS KVM ? At the very least that
sut
zlabs.org; Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v2] kvm: powerpc: booke: Add linux pte lookup like
> booke3s
>
> On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 17:58 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >
> > What about 64-bit PTEs on 32-bit kernels?
> >
> > In any case, this code does not be
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 02:58 +, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> One of the problem I saw was that if I put this code in
> asm/pgtable-32.h and asm/pgtable-64.h then pte_persent() and other
> friend function (on which this code depends) are defined in pgtable.h.
> And pgtable.h includes asm/pgtabl
.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v2] kvm: powerpc: booke: Add linux pte lookup like
> booke3s
>
> On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 02:58 +, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> > One of the problem I saw was that if I put this code in
> > asm/pgtable-32.h and asm/pgtable-64.h then pte_p
Scott-B07421; ag...@suse.de; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org;
> > kvm@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v2] kvm: powerpc: booke: Add linux pte lookup like
> > booke3s
> >
> > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 02:58 +, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> >
> Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 9:54 AM
> > > To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> > > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; ag...@suse.de; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org;
> > > kvm@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v2] kvm: powerpc: booke: Ad
...@suse.de; kvm-
> > p...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
> > linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v2] kvm: powerpc: booke: Add linux pte lookup
> > like booke3s
> >
> > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 09:27 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R6
> Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 9:54 AM
> > > To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> > > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; ag...@suse.de; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org;
> > > kvm@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v2] kvm: powerpc: booke: Ad
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:02:48AM +, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
>
> I am trying to me the Linux pte search and update generic so that this can be
> used for powerpc as well.
>
> I am not sure which of the below two should be ok, please help
Given that the BookE code uses gfn_to_pfn_memsl
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 10:24 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:02:48AM +, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to me the Linux pte search and update generic so that this can
> > be used for powerpc as well.
> >
> > I am not sure which of the below two shoul
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:11:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 10:24 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:02:48AM +, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> > >
> > > I am trying to me the Linux pte search and update generic so that this
> > > can be used fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
