Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-02-03:
On 02/02/2015 16:33, Wincy Van wrote:
static void vmx_accomp_nested_posted_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)
vmx-nested.posted_intr_nv != -1
On 28/01/2015 17:02, Wincy Van wrote:
+static int vmx_deliver_nested_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ int vector)
+{
+ if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)
+ vector == to_vmx(vcpu)-nested.posted_intr_nv
+ vcpu-mode ==
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Zhang, Yang Z yang.z.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-02-03:
On 02/02/2015 16:33, Wincy Van wrote:
static void vmx_accomp_nested_posted_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
if
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/01/2015 17:02, Wincy Van wrote:
+static int vmx_deliver_nested_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ int vector)
+{
+ if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)
+
On 02/02/2015 16:33, Wincy Van wrote:
static void vmx_accomp_nested_posted_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)
vmx-nested.posted_intr_nv != -1
pi_test_on(vmx-nested.pi_desc))