Re: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs for cleanup and considing EXB bit

Dong, Eddie wrote: Looks good, but doesn't apply; please check if you are working against the latest version. Rebased on top of a317a1e496b22d1520218ecf16a02498b99645e2 + previous rsvd bits violation check patch. Applied, thanks. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug

RE: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs for cleanup and considing EXB bit

> > Looks good, but doesn't apply; please check if you are working against > the latest version. Rebased on top of a317a1e496b22d1520218ecf16a02498b99645e2 + previous rsvd bits violation check patch. thx, eddie Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs and remove bit 5-6 from rsvd_bits_mask pe

Re: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs for cleanup and considing EXB bit

Dong, Eddie wrote: Neiger, Gil wrote: PDPTEs are used only if CR0.PG=CR4.PAE=1. In that situation, their format depends the value of IA32_EFER.LMA. If IA32_EFER.LMA=0, bit 63 is reserved and must be 0 in any PDPTE that is marked present. The execute-disable setting of a page is determined

RE: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs for cleanup and considing EXB bit

Neiger, Gil wrote: > PDPTEs are used only if CR0.PG=CR4.PAE=1. > > In that situation, their format depends the value of IA32_EFER.LMA. > > If IA32_EFER.LMA=0, bit 63 is reserved and must be 0 in any PDPTE > that is marked present. The execute-disable setting of a page is > determined only by the

RE: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs for cleanup and considing EXB bit

PDPTEs are used only if CR0.PG=CR4.PAE=1. In that situation, their format depends the value of IA32_EFER.LMA. If IA32_EFER.LMA=0, bit 63 is reserved and must be 0 in any PDPTE that is marked present. The execute-disable setting of a page is determined only by the PDE and PTE. If IA32_EFER.LMA

RE: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs for cleanup and considing EXB bit

Avi Kivity wrote: > Dong, Eddie wrote: >> @@ -2199,6 +2194,9 @@ void reset_rsvds_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu >> *vcpu, int level) context->rsvd_bits_mask[1][0] = 0; >> break; >> case PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL: >> +context->rsvd_bits_mask[0][2] = exb_bit_rsvd | >> +

Re: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs for cleanup and considing EXB bit

Dong, Eddie wrote: @@ -2199,6 +2194,9 @@ void reset_rsvds_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int level) context->rsvd_bits_mask[1][0] = 0; break; case PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL: + context->rsvd_bits_mask[0][2] = exb_bit_rsvd | + rs

RE: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs for cleanup and considing EXB bit

Dong, Eddie wrote: > This is followup of rsvd_bits emulation. > Base on new rsvd_bits emulation patch. thx, eddie commit 2c1472ef2b9fd87a261e8b58a7db11afd6a111dc Author: root Date: Mon Mar 30 17:05:47 2009 +0800 Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs for cleanup with EXB bit considered.