On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:15:22AM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
We also hacked the source like the patch. But the issue is not caused by it.
We are still trying to figure the reason out. Thanks!
Xiantao
With the patch below I am able to compile kvm-userspace on IA64 and run linux
guest.
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:15:22AM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
We also hacked the source like the patch. But the issue is not
caused by it. We are still trying to figure the reason out. Thanks!
Xiantao
With the patch below I am able to compile kvm-userspace on IA64
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:56:07PM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:15:22AM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
We also hacked the source like the patch. But the issue is not
caused by it. We are still trying to figure the reason out. Thanks!
Xiantao
Tosatti; Ingo Molnar; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Peter
Zijlstra
Subject: Re: x86: use smp_send_reschedule in kvm_vcpu_kick
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:31:47AM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
OK, reworked patch:
- change ia64 in addition to x86
- add comment
Avi Kivity wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
OK, reworked patch:
- change ia64 in addition to x86
- add comment on smp send reschedule handlers about KVM's usage
Untested on IA64.
KVM: use smp_send_reschedule in kvm_vcpu_kick
KVM uses a function call IPI to cause the exit of a guest
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:53:50PM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
@@ -72,7 +73,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
struct mutex mutex;
int cpu;
struct kvm_run *run;
- int guest_mode;
unsigned long requests;
unsigned long guest_debug;
int
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:25:57PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:25:20AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:53:50PM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
@@ -72,7 +73,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
struct mutex mutex;
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
@@ -72,7 +73,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
struct mutex mutex;
int cpu;
struct kvm_run *run;
- int guest_mode;
unsigned long requests;
unsigned long guest_debug;
int fpu_active;
The deletion will break other archs which depend on
