On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:53:56PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I would be much more inclined to consider
> taking raw and improving the performance long term if guest<->host
> networking worked. This appears to be a fundamental limitation though
> and I think it's something that will for
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 17:53 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> So at this point, I think it's a mistake to include raw socket support.
> If the goal is to improve networking usability such that it just works
> as a root user, let's incorporate a default network script that creates
> a bridge or s
Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
Can't we bind the raw socket to the tap interface instead of the
physical interface and allow the bridge config to work.
But why use the raw interface instead of tap directly.
Let me summarize the discussion so far:
Raw sockets
Pros:
o User specifies a network inte
