On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:56:54PM +, Auld, Will wrote:
Having looked closer at the tacked of changing out the index and data fields
in some
function calls for a struct parameter with these and a originator field (host
or guest)
it is less attractive than I thought it would be. The only
Having looked closer at the tacked of changing out the index and data fields in
some
function calls for a struct parameter with these and a originator field (host
or guest)
it is less attractive than I thought it would be. The only place where we need
to know the initiator is in kvm_write_tsc()
On 10/17/2012 04:10 AM, Will Auld wrote:
Signed-off-by: Will Auld will.a...@intel.com
---
Resending to full list
Marcelo,
This patch is what I believe you ask for as foundational for later
patches to address IA32_TSC_ADJUST.
Please write a changelog to reflect the motivation.
All
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:35:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/17/2012 04:10 AM, Will Auld wrote:
Signed-off-by: Will Auld will.a...@intel.com
---
Resending to full list
Marcelo,
This patch is what I believe you ask for as foundational for later
patches to address
On 10/17/2012 04:09 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:35:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/17/2012 04:10 AM, Will Auld wrote:
Signed-off-by: Will Auld will.a...@intel.com
---
Resending to full list
Marcelo,
This patch is what I believe you ask for as
OK, agreed it is not pretty.
Thanks,
Will
-Original Message-
From: Marcelo Tosatti [mailto:mtosa...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 7:09 AM
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Auld, Will; Will Auld; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Xiantao; Liu,
Jinsong
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added call
