On 05/11/2014 10:03, Tiejun Chen wrote:
Finally we always return highest_irr so its unnecessary to return -1
after check if highest_irr == -1.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen tiejun.c...@intel.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 2014/11/5 18:22, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 05/11/2014 10:03, Tiejun Chen wrote:
Finally we always return highest_irr so its unnecessary to return -1
after check if highest_irr == -1.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen tiejun.c...@intel.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1