On 04/24/2013 04:25 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 10:57 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> We don't really need 64MB of RAM to boot, it's a nice default if we don't
>> have anything else - but it's not actually required for anything:
>
> Nice, I am carrying something similar locall
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:25:30PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 10:57 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > We don't really need 64MB of RAM to boot, it's a nice default if we don't
> > have anything else - but it's not actually required for anything:
>
> Nice, I am carrying some
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 10:57 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> We don't really need 64MB of RAM to boot, it's a nice default if we don't
> have anything else - but it's not actually required for anything:
Nice, I am carrying something similar locally so I can boot in 4K :)
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from
On 04/23/2013 05:57 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
We don't really need 64MB of RAM to boot, it's a nice default if we don't
have anything else - but it's not actually required for anything:
sh-4.2# free -h
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 20M
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:57:34PM +0100, Sasha Levin wrote:
> We don't really need 64MB of RAM to boot, it's a nice default if we don't
> have anything else - but it's not actually required for anything:
>
> sh-4.2# free -h
> total used free sharedbuffers cach
