Hi Pavel,
On 02/10/15 13:39, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Hello!
>
>> Can't you use the ELRSR bitmap instead? The idea of lr_used sounds like
>> a moot optimization to me.
>
> This perfectly works on 4.2, but will break HW interrupt forwarding on 4.3.
> If you look at 4.3
> __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(),
Hello!
> Can't you use the ELRSR bitmap instead? The idea of lr_used sounds like
> a moot optimization to me.
This perfectly works on 4.2, but will break HW interrupt forwarding on 4.3. If
you look at 4.3
__kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(), you'll notice that for HW interrupts lr_used and
elrsr_ptr wi
Hello!
> For instance how did you come up with that 16384? LPIs could actually be
> much bigger (in fact the emulation currently support up to 64k).
Well, read "at least 16384". I actually don't remember the exact value you've
put in.
> > Since the map itself is actually used only for piggy-
Hi Pavel,
On 02/10/15 10:55, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Hello! One more concern.
>
>> Currently we track which IRQ has been mapped to which VGIC list
>> register and also have to synchronize both. We used to do this
>> to hold some extra state (for instance the active bit).
>> It turns out that this e
Hello! One more concern.
> Currently we track which IRQ has been mapped to which VGIC list
> register and also have to synchronize both. We used to do this
> to hold some extra state (for instance the active bit).
> It turns out that this extra state in the LRs is no longer needed and
> this extr
On 31/08/15 09:42, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 08/24/2015 06:33 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Salut Eric,
...
@@ -1126,9 +1124,9 @@ static void vgic_queue_irq_to_lr(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu, int irq,
*/
bool vgic_queue_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 sgi_source_id, int irq)
{
>>>
On 08/24/2015 06:33 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 12/08/15 10:01, Eric Auger wrote:
>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>>> index bc40137..394622c 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>>> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@
>>> #include "vgi
Hi Eric,
On 12/08/15 10:01, Eric Auger wrote:
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>> index bc40137..394622c 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@
>> #include "vgic.h"
>>
>> static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct k
Hi Andre,
On 07/10/2015 04:21 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently we track which IRQ has been mapped to which VGIC list
> register and also have to synchronize both. We used to do this
> to hold some extra state (for instance the active bit).
> It turns out that this extra state in the LRs is no
