Alexander Graf writes:
> On 05/07/2014 11:57 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> How virtio implementations should determine their endianness is
> a spec question, I think; at any rate QEMU and kvmtool ought to
> agree on how it's done. I think the most recent suggestion on the
> QEMU mailin
On Wed, 7 May 2014 13:17:51 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 May 2014 12:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:40:54 am BST, Greg Kurz
> > wrote:
> >> All the fuzz is not really about enforcing kernel access... PPC also
> >> has a current endianness selector (MSR_LE) but it on
On 07/05/14 13:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 May 2014 12:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:40:54 am BST, Greg Kurz
>> wrote:
>>> All the fuzz is not really about enforcing kernel access... PPC also
>>> has a current endianness selector (MSR_LE) but it only makes sense
>>> if
On 7 May 2014 13:16, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> That being said, I'm going to stop replying to this thread, and instead
> go back writing code, posting it, and getting on with my life in
> virtio-legacy land.
Some of us are trying to have a conversation in this thread
about virtio-legacy behaviour :-)
On 7 May 2014 12:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:40:54 am BST, Greg Kurz
> wrote:
>> All the fuzz is not really about enforcing kernel access... PPC also
>> has a current endianness selector (MSR_LE) but it only makes sense
>> if you are in the cpu context. Initial versions o
On 07/05/14 12:49, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 12:46 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:10:56 am BST, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> On 7 May 2014 10:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> Current opinion on
On 05/07/2014 12:46 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:10:56 am BST, Peter Maydell
wrote:
On 7 May 2014 10:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
wrote:
Current opinion on the qemu-devel thread seems to be that we
should just define tha
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:40:54 am BST, Greg Kurz
wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2014 10:52:01 +0100
> Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>> > On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> >>> On Tue,
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:10:56 am BST, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 7 May 2014 10:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> Current opinion on the qemu-devel thread seems to be that we
>>> should just define that the endianness of the virtio de
On Wed, 07 May 2014 10:52:01 +0100
Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
> > On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon
> >>> wrote:
> O
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:11:13 am BST, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 11:57 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Huh? What if my guest has usespace using an idmap, with Stage-1 MMU for
>> isolation only (much like an MPU)? R-class guests anyone?
>>
>> Agreed, this is not the general use case, but t
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 12:11:13PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 11:57 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:42:54 am BST, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>Am 07.05.2014 um 11:34 schrieb Peter Maydell :
> >>>
> On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >On 6 May
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:55:45 am BST, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Am 07.05.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Marc Zyngier :
>>
>>> On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
>>> wrote:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Tue, Ma
On 05/07/2014 11:57 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:42:54 am BST, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 um 11:34 schrieb Peter Maydell :
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon
On 7 May 2014 10:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> Current opinion on the qemu-devel thread seems to be that we
>> should just define that the endianness of the virtio device is
>> the endianness of the guest kernel at the point where the
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:42:54 am BST, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Am 07.05.2014 um 11:34 schrieb Peter Maydell :
>>
>>> On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon
> wrote:
>> On Thu,
> Am 07.05.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Marc Zyngier :
>
>> On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon
> wrote:
>> On
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +
> Am 07.05.2014 um 11:34 schrieb Peter Maydell :
>
>> On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +reg
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
+reg.addr = (u64)&data;
+if (ioctl(vcpu->vcpu_fd, KVM_GET_ONE
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> +reg.addr = (u64)&data;
>>> +if (ioctl(vcpu->vcpu_fd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®) < 0)
>>> +die("KVM_GET_ONE_RE
Hi Will,
On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Implement the kcm_cpu__get_endianness call for both AArch32 and
>
> s/kcm/kvm/
Are you saying that I hace fat fingers? ;-)
>> AArch64, and advertis
Hi Marc,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Implement the kcm_cpu__get_endianness call for both AArch32 and
s/kcm/kvm/
> AArch64, and advertise the bi-endianness support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
> ---
> tools/kvm/arm/aarch32/kvm-cpu.c | 14
23 matches
Mail list logo
