On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-04-03 15:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in
kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-04-03 09:23, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in
kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed
KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL.
This series depends on kvm: set gsi_bits and max_gsi
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in
kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed
KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL.
This series depends on kvm: set gsi_bits and max_gsi correctly
On 2012-04-03 15:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in
kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed
KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL.
This series depends on kvm: set gsi_bits and
On 2012-04-03 09:23, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in
kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed
KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL.
This series depends on kvm: set gsi_bits and max_gsi correctly
