On 03.10.2010, at 10:35, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2010, Alexander Graf wrote about "Re: TSC in nested SVM and
> VMX":
>> Looking through the spec, the only indicator I've found is this passage:
>>
>> TSC_OFFSET - an offset to add when th
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010, Alexander Graf wrote about "Re: TSC in nested SVM and
VMX":
> Looking through the spec, the only indicator I've found is this passage:
>
> TSC_OFFSET - an offset to add when the guest reads the TSC (time stamp
> counter). Guest writes to the
01/2010 04:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 01.10.2010, at 13:21, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010, Zachary Amsden wrote about "Re: TSC in ne
chary Amsden wrote about "Re: TSC in nested SVM and
VMX":
1) When reading an MSR, we are not emulating the L2 guest; we are
DIRECTLY reading the MSR for the L1 emulation. Any emulation of the L2
guest is actually done by the code running /inside/ the L1 emulation, so
MSR r
On 02.10.2010, at 03:56, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Am 01.10.2010 um 21:22 schrieb Zachary Amsden :
>
>> On 10/01/2010 04:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 01.10.2010, at 13:21, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep
Am 01.10.2010 um 21:22 schrieb Zachary Amsden :
> On 10/01/2010 04:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 01.10.2010, at 13:21, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010, Zachary Amsden wrote about "Re: TSC in nested SVM and
>>> VMX&qu
On 10/01/2010 04:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 01.10.2010, at 13:21, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010, Zachary Amsden wrote about "Re: TSC in nested SVM and
VMX":
1) When reading an MSR, we are not emulating the L2 guest; we are
DIRECTLY reading the
On 01.10.2010, at 13:21, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010, Zachary Amsden wrote about "Re: TSC in nested SVM and
> VMX":
>> 1) When reading an MSR, we are not emulating the L2 guest; we are
>> DIRECTLY reading the MSR for the L1 emulation. Any
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010, Zachary Amsden wrote about "Re: TSC in nested SVM and
VMX":
> 1) When reading an MSR, we are not emulating the L2 guest; we are
> DIRECTLY reading the MSR for the L1 emulation. Any emulation of the L2
> guest is actually done by the code running /insid
On 09/30/2010 12:50 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the TSC handling code has recently changed, and since it
wasn't done correctly in the nested VMX patch, I wanted to take the opportunity
to fix it.
I looked at what nested SVM does about TSC, and most of it I think I
understand, but
10 matches
Mail list logo