Hello folks,
The RFC-v5 patch for tcm_vhost kernel code was sent out for review a bit
less than 24 hours ago, and thus far there has not been any additional
comments.. Thanks to everyone who has been participating in the various
threads over the past week and giving their feedback!
Also, just a
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:03:39AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
eduard.munte...@linux360.ro wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:37:31AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:03:39AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
That's true, but it's fair to be concerned about the guest itself.
Imagine it runs some possibly malicious apps which program the hardware
to do DMA. That should be safe when a IOMMU is present.
But suddenly the guest OS
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:41:55PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:03:39AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
eduard.munte...@linux360.ro wrote:
But suddenly the guest OS changes mappings and expects the IOMMU to
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:37:31AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
eduard.munte...@linux360.ro wrote:
On the other hand, we could just leave it alone for now. Changing
mappings during DMA is stupid anyway: I don't think the guest can
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
eduard.munte...@linux360.ro wrote:
On the other hand, we could just leave it alone for now. Changing
mappings during DMA is stupid anyway: I don't think the guest can
recover the results of DMA safely, even though it might be used on
Hi everybody,
Here's a status update (a public one this time) on my work:
---
Accomplishments:
- [DONE] Generic IOMMU API for devices
- [DONE] PIIX IDE uses the new API
- [DONE] Permissions handling
Bonus:
- [DONE] RTL8139 converted
Objectives:
- [WIP] Reporting IO page faults in the event
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 14:44 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
* Yu's idea about TLB handling was great, and I saw about a 20%
performance improvement on a couple small workloads on 440. Very
happy about that one. :)
This patch, which I'll call the direct TLB patch,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hollis Blanchard
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 3:44 AM
To: kvm-ppc
Subject: kernel status update
I've posted most of the patches here before, but I've built up a small
backlog of patches
I've posted most of the patches here before, but I've built up a small
backlog of patches to be pushed upstream. I've been running with them
long enough to be happy with them, and I've just posted them all to
http://penguinppc.org/~hollisb/kvm/patches/
There are two really minor patches I want to
10 matches
Mail list logo
