This patch factors out the common initialization of tap into a new helper
net_init_tap_one(). This will be used by multiqueue tap patches.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
---
net/tap.c | 130
This patch factors out the common initialization of tap into a new helper
net_init_tap_one(). This will be used by multiqueue tap patches.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com
---
net/tap.c | 130 ++---
1 files changed, 73
This patch factors out the common initialization of tap into a new helper
net_init_tap_one(). This will be used by multiqueue tap patches.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com
---
net/tap.c | 130 ++---
1 files changed, 73
This patch factors out the common initialization of tap into a new helper
net_init_tap_one(). This will be used by multiqueue tap patches.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com
---
net/tap.c | 130 ++---
1 files changed, 73
On 07/08/2009 08:17 AM, Stephane Bakhos wrote:
I've been having some problem with recent releases when it comes to
tap
initialization. It seems that the script is ran after the tap is
opened. I
think this is a bit weird and useless as I want the script to setup
the
tap by itself
I've been having some problem with recent releases when it comes to tap
initialization. It seems that the script is ran after the tap is opened. I
think this is a bit weird and useless as I want the script to setup the
tap by itself.
In net.c, the initialization (I assume) happen in
static
On 07/07/2009 09:48 PM, Stephane Bakhos wrote:
I've been having some problem with recent releases when it comes to
tap initialization. It seems that the script is ran after the tap is
opened. I think this is a bit weird and useless as I want the script
to setup the tap by itself.
In net.c
I've been having some problem with recent releases when it comes to tap
initialization. It seems that the script is ran after the tap is opened. I
think this is a bit weird and useless as I want the script to setup the
tap by itself.
In net.c, the initialization (I assume) happen in
static
