Re: Virtual drives performance

2011-09-07 Thread Asdo
On 09/07/11 00:25, TooMeeK wrote: Next, I've tried following combinations with virt-manager 0.8.4 (from XML of VM): 1.on Debian VM with virtio drivers for both storage and NIC: partition type used in guest: EXT4 result: poor performance, 9-10MB/s sequentional copy via SMB 2.on Debian VM wit

Re: Virtual drives performance

2011-09-07 Thread Virtbie
On 09/07/11 00:25, TooMeeK wrote: Next, I've tried following combinations with virt-manager 0.8.4 (from XML of VM): 1.on Debian VM with virtio drivers for both storage and NIC: partition type used in guest: EXT4 result: poor performance, 9-10MB/s sequentional copy via SMB 2.on Debian VM with

Re: Virtual drives performance

2011-09-07 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:25 PM, TooMeeK wrote: > First, I created mirrored storage in hypervisor from one 600-gig partition > (yes, that's correct - I have only one drive currently), details: > sudo mdadm --detail /dev/md3 > /dev/md3: >        Version : 1.2 >  Creation Time : Thu Jul 28 20:07:00

Re: Virtual drives performance

2011-09-06 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach TooMeeK [2011.09.07.0025 +0200]: > Partition type is Linux RAID autodetect This is not really necessary, presuming that you are doing what everyone is doing nowadays and assemble the RAID from the initrd or the init scripts. > I find that way it's not possible to direct attach PARTIT

Virtual drives performance

2011-09-06 Thread TooMeeK
Hello, I'm trying to set up a fast virtualized Samba file server. I'm using Debian Sqeeze 64 bit as hypervisor. First, I created mirrored storage in hypervisor from one 600-gig partition (yes, that's correct - I have only one drive currently), details: sudo mdadm --detail /dev/md3 /dev/md3: