Erik Rull wrote:
Hi Avi,
no I'm using a partition as a drive, here's my command-line:
taskset 0x0002 /usr/X11R6/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -usb -drive
file=/dev/hda2,cache=off -m 1536 -net nic,macaddr=$MACADDR -net
tap,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -no-acpi -monitor stdio -L
/usr/X11R6/share/qemu
Erik Rull wrote:
Hi Avi,
there are some .NET apps running, doing some calculations and graphic
2D display, HDD access w/ database and some TCP/IP transfer.
Are you using qcow2? What is your qemu command line?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To
Erik Rull wrote:
Hi Avi,
here is the cpuinfo - what do you mean with workload? The CPU isage
is around 33%.
What programs is the guest running?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a
Hi Avi,
here is the cpuinfo - what do you mean with workload? The CPU isage is
around 33%.
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83GHz
stepping: 2
cpu MHz :
Erik Rull wrote:
Hi all,
very very interesting.
I have a similar problem but the other way round.
If my XP runs up tp 100% CPU usage top on the linux host reports
only 33% cpu usage. I would expect around 50% because I only provide
one core for the guest. I already increased the process
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 11:56 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Ross,
Can you confirm the qemu process CPU consumption is down to acceptable
levels if you dont specify -no-acpi?
Thanks
Simply starting without -no-acpi did not help. I tried to do a Windows
XP repair, but seemed to end up
Using ACPI fixes the problem; CPU useage is now quite low. Start line
was
sudo vdeq kvm -net nic,vlan=1,macaddr=52:54:a0:12:01:00 \
-net vde,vlan=1,sock=/var/run/vde2/tap0.ctl \
-boot d -cdrom /usr/local/backup/XPProSP3.iso \
-std-vga -hda /dev/turtle/XP00 \
-soundhw es1370
On May 15, 2009, at 3:24 PM, Ross Boylan wrote:
Using ACPI fixes the problem; CPU useage is now quite low. Start line
was
sudo vdeq kvm -net nic,vlan=1,macaddr=52:54:a0:12:01:00 \
-net vde,vlan=1,sock=/var/run/vde2/tap0.ctl \
-boot d -cdrom /usr/local/backup/XPProSP3.iso \
-std-vga
I had a similar problem some weeks ago. Finally I found out that my VM
running WinXP was working on a non-acpi system (maybe I started kvm
with -no-acpi option during the installation). In the Device Manager
there has to be the entry Computer-ACPI Multiprocessor PC.
Otherwise the VM produced 100%
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:56:18AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
I just installed XP into a new VM, specifying -smp 2 for the machine.
According to top, it's using nearly 200% of a cpu even when I'm not
doing anything.
Is this real CPU useage, or just a reporting problem (just
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 12:19 +0200, Johannes Schlatow wrote:
I had a similar problem some weeks ago. Finally I found out that my VM
running WinXP was working on a non-acpi system (maybe I started kvm
with -no-acpi option during the installation). In the Device Manager
there has to be the entry
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 09:56 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
I just installed XP into a new VM, specifying -smp 2 for the machine.
According to top, it's using nearly 200% of a cpu even when I'm not
doing anything.
Is this real CPU useage, or just a reporting problem (just as
Ross Boylan wrote:
I just installed XP into a new VM, specifying -smp 2 for the machine.
According to top, it's using nearly 200% of a cpu even when I'm not
doing anything.
Is this real CPU useage, or just a reporting problem (just as my disk
image is big according to ls, but isn't really)?
If
Hi all,
very very interesting.
I have a similar problem but the other way round.
If my XP runs up tp 100% CPU usage top on the linux host reports only
33% cpu usage. I would expect around 50% because I only provide one core
for the guest. I already increased the process priority of qemu and
I just installed XP into a new VM, specifying -smp 2 for the machine.
According to top, it's using nearly 200% of a cpu even when I'm not
doing anything.
Is this real CPU useage, or just a reporting problem (just as my disk
image is big according to ls, but isn't really)?
If it's real, is there
Hi,
I'm facing the same problem here.
A Windows XP (SP3 + all current Updates) which uses constantly ~95% CPU on
each core.
I've already tried:
- Using only 1 core
- Replacing the HAL in Windows
- Using another KVM version
- Using different timer options for KVM
I'm currently on KVM-85 where
16 matches
Mail list logo
