Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-12 Thread Ryan Harper
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-03-12 02:26]: Regarding the stepfiles you created for Linux -- I can't help much with those since I don't have the data. I do believe that if I had the data and the stepfiles I could quickly identify the problem, so if you think those

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-12 Thread Ryan Harper
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-03-12 09:04]: yep, used stepeditor to fix; defintely worth documenting where one should be invoking stepeditor -- from the steps dir; if you don't run it from there, it won't find the steps_data dir =( Are you absolutely sure about that?

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-11 Thread Michael Goldish
- Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com wrote: * Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-03-10 20:55]: - Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com wrote: - guest install wizard using md5sum region matching ... ouch. This is quite fickle. I've seen different kvms generate different

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-11 Thread Ryan Harper
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-03-11 03:08]: I'd like to comment on this. I don't doubt that some fuzzy matching algorithm (such as calculating match percentages) would generally be more robust. I do however doubt it would significantly lower the false positive rate in

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-11 Thread Ryan Harper
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-03-11 03:02]: We've also been creating stepfiles for Linux guests as well that aren't here, various SLES and RHEL installs -- and I've repeatedly seen the same issue where the cropped region *should* match but isn't, and it isn't a result of

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-10 Thread Michael Goldish
- Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com wrote: - guest install wizard using md5sum region matching ... ouch. This is quite fickle. I've seen different kvms generate different md5sum for the same region a couple of times. I know distributing screenshots of certain OSes is a grey area,

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-10 Thread Ryan Harper
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-03-10 20:55]: - Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com wrote: - guest install wizard using md5sum region matching ... ouch. This is quite fickle. I've seen different kvms generate different md5sum for the same region a couple of times. I

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-09 Thread Ryan Harper
* Uri Lublin u...@redhat.com [2009-03-04 01:59]: I noticed the references to the setup isos for windows that presumbly install cygwin telnetd/sshd, are those available? if the isos themselves aren't, if the build instructions are, that would be very useful. You are right. We do have an

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-09 Thread Uri Lublin
Ryan Harper wrote: * Uri Lublin u...@redhat.com [2009-03-04 01:59]: I noticed the references to the setup isos for windows that presumbly install cygwin telnetd/sshd, are those available? if the isos themselves aren't, if the build instructions are, that would be very useful. You are right.

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-04 Thread Ryan Harper
* Uri Lublin u...@redhat.com [2009-03-04 02:59]: - it seems like the definition and rules ought to be separate from the last section which defines which tests to run (the fc8_quick area), so adding something as simple as include support to kvm_config.py would be sufficient to support

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-04 Thread sudhir kumar
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com wrote: * Uri Lublin u...@redhat.com [2009-03-04 02:59]:  - it seems like the definition and rules ought to be separate from the  last section which defines which tests to run (the fc8_quick area), so  adding something as simple

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-04 Thread Dor Laor
sudhir kumar wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com wrote: * Uri Lublin u...@redhat.com [2009-03-04 02:59]: - it seems like the definition and rules ought to be separate from the last section which defines which tests to run (the fc8_quick area), so

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-04 Thread Uri Lublin
From: Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com Uri Lublin u...@redhat.com [2009-03-04 02:59]: - it seems like the definition and rules ought to be separate from the last section which defines which tests to run (the fc8_quick area), so adding something as simple as include support to kvm_config.py

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-04 Thread Uri Lublin
From: sudhir kumar smalik...@gmail.com On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com wrote: * Uri Lublin u...@redhat.com [2009-03-04 02:59]: - guest install wizard using md5sum region matching ... ouch.  This is quite fickle.  I've seen different kvms generate different md5sum

Re: kvm-autotest -- introducing kvm_runtest_2

2009-03-02 Thread Ryan Harper
* Uri Lublin u...@redhat.com [2009-03-01 13:10]: Hello, KVM-autotest is a test framework for kvm, based on autotest (http://autotest.kernel.org). Its purpose is to keep kvm stable. For developers, we want to find regressions early. For users, we want users to feel confident kvm runs