Re: poor performance of passed-through VGA

2014-04-09 Thread rndbit
On 04/08/2014 10:47 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 22:24 +0300, rndbit wrote: >> On 04/08/2014 08:00 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: >>> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:01 +0300, rndbit wrote: Hello, I am one of those early tinkerers with VGA passthrough. This is very exciti

Re: poor performance of passed-through VGA

2014-04-08 Thread Alex Williamson
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 22:24 +0300, rndbit wrote: > On 04/08/2014 08:00 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:01 +0300, rndbit wrote: > >> Hello, > >> I am one of those early tinkerers with VGA passthrough. This is very > >> exciting feature > >> and as soon as i saw it i thought

Re: poor performance of passed-through VGA

2014-04-08 Thread rndbit
On 04/08/2014 08:00 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:01 +0300, rndbit wrote: >> Hello, >> I am one of those early tinkerers with VGA passthrough. This is very >> exciting feature >> and as soon as i saw it i thought to myself that i want that "95% speed of >> bare metal" >> a

Re: poor performance of passed-through VGA

2014-04-08 Thread Alex Williamson
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 17:01 +0300, rndbit wrote: > Hello, > I am one of those early tinkerers with VGA passthrough. This is very exciting > feature > and as soon as i saw it i thought to myself that i want that "95% speed of > bare metal" > as various sources claimed. So i invested into some harw

poor performance of passed-through VGA

2014-04-08 Thread rndbit
Hello, I am one of those early tinkerers with VGA passthrough. This is very exciting feature and as soon as i saw it i thought to myself that i want that "95% speed of bare metal" as various sources claimed. So i invested into some harware only to find out that actual 3d performance is far lower