Hi all,
we experience filesystem corruption using virtio-blk on some guest systems
togehter with XFS. We still use qemu-kvm 0.12.4.
Does someone remember if there has been a fix submitted meanwhile?
It seems that 64-bit Ubuntu LTS 10.04.1 is affected as well as an older
openSuse 11.1 system wit
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> we experience filesystem corruption using virtio-blk on some guest systems
> togehter with XFS. We still use qemu-kvm 0.12.4.
[...]
> It seems that 64-bit Ubuntu LTS 10.04.1 is affected as well as an older
> openSuse 11.1 system with kernel
Am 25.09.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> we experience filesystem corruption using virtio-blk on some guest systems
>> togehter with XFS. We still use qemu-kvm 0.12.4.
> [...]
>> It seems that 64-bit Ubuntu LTS 10.04.1 is affected
FYI, qemu 0.12.2 is missing:
block: fix sector comparism in multiwrite_req_compare
which in the past was very good at triggering XFS guest corruption.
Please try with the patch applied or even better latests qemu from git.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm"
Am 25.09.2010 um 17:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> FYI, qemu 0.12.2 is missing:
you mean 0.12.4 not 0.12.2, don't you?
>
> block: fix sector comparism in multiwrite_req_compare
>
> which in the past was very good at triggering XFS guest corruption.
> Please try with the patch applied o
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 25.09.2010 um 17:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>
> > FYI, qemu 0.12.2 is missing:
>
> you mean 0.12.4 not 0.12.2, don't you?
Yes, sorry. (but 0.12.2 is of course missing it, too..)
> > which in the past was very good at trigg
Am 25.09.2010 um 17:58 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>
>> Am 25.09.2010 um 17:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>>
>>> FYI, qemu 0.12.2 is missing:
>>
>> you mean 0.12.4 not 0.12.2, don't you?
>
> Yes, sorry. (but 0.12.2 is of course m
Am 25.09.2010 um 17:58 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>
>> Am 25.09.2010 um 17:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>>
>>> FYI, qemu 0.12.2 is missing:
>>
>> you mean 0.12.4 not 0.12.2, don't you?
>
> Yes, sorry. (but 0.12.2 is of course m
Am 25.09.2010 um 20:11 schrieb Peter Lieven:
>
> Am 25.09.2010 um 17:58 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 25.09.2010 um 17:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>>>
FYI, qemu 0.12.2 is missing:
>>>
>>> you mean 0.12.4 not 0.