It looks like the variable pc is defined. At least the current code always
failed on me stating that pc is already defined somewhere else.
Let's use _pc instead, because that doesn't collide.
Is this the right approach? Does it break on 440 too? If not, why not?
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
It looks like the variable pc is defined. At least the current code always
failed on me stating that pc is already defined somewhere else.
Let's use _pc instead, because that doesn't collide.
Is this the right approach? Does it break on 440 too? If not, why not?
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
It looks like the variable pc is defined. At least the current code always
failed on me stating that pc is already defined somewhere else.
Let's use _pc instead, because that doesn't collide.
Is this the right approach? Does it break on 440 too? If not, why not?
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 14:42 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
After much digging, I managed to actually enable CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS.
However, I still don't get any build errors from this code. Maybe you
could paste the full gcc output?
Another option is to be a bit more ppc-ish and call it IAR
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 10:18 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
It looks like the variable pc is defined. At least the current code always
failed on me stating that pc is already defined somewhere else.
Let's use _pc instead, because that doesn't collide.
Is this the right approach? Does it break
It looks like the variable pc is defined. At least the current code always
failed on me stating that pc is already defined somewhere else.
Let's use _pc instead, because that doesn't collide.
Is this the right approach? Does it break on 440 too? If not, why not?
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
