This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
Alex
On 18.07.2013, at 15:19, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
---
v2:
- No change
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so
allow him.
-Bharat
Alex
On 18.07.2013, at 15:19, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
Signed
@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan
Bharat-R65777
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so
allow him.
Please add
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:50 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
@vger.kernel.org; Wood
Scott-B07421; Bhushan
Bharat-R65777
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E
attribute in mas2
This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting
E, so allow him.
FWIW, it'd
This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
Alex
On 18.07.2013, at 15:19, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
---
v2:
- No change
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan
Bharat-R65777
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting E, so
allow him.
Please add
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:50 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E attribute in mas2
...@vger.kernel.org; Wood
Scott-B07421; Bhushan
Bharat-R65777
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kvm: powerpc: Do not ignore E
attribute in mas2
This needs a description. Why shouldn't we ignore E?
What I understood is that there is no reason to stop guest setting
E, so allow him.
FWIW, it'd
