On Saturday 27 January 2007 16:28, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> 27 Oca 2007 Cts tarihinde, Avi Kivity şunları yazmıştı:
> > The patch looks correct, but I don't understand the gcc error message.
> > Are we sure this isn't a gcc 4.2 bug?
> >
> > "g" appears to be equivalent to "rmi", if "i" is impossible,
27 Oca 2007 Cts tarihinde, Avi Kivity şunları yazmıştı:
> The patch looks correct, but I don't understand the gcc error message.
> Are we sure this isn't a gcc 4.2 bug?
>
> "g" appears to be equivalent to "rmi", if "i" is impossible, gcc is free
> to use "r" or "m", no?
Accorgind to GCC devs. its
On Saturday 27 of January 2007 10:05:53 Avi Kivity wrote:
> "g" appears to be equivalent to "rmi", if "i" is impossible, gcc is free
> to use "r" or "m", no?
`r'
A register operand is allowed provided that it is in a general
register.
`g'
Any register, memory or immediate integer o
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 10:34 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> In addition, quite a few performance optimizations are missing from kvm:
Hi Avi!
Just thought I'd share my experience with some of these optimizations
in lguest. I use virtbench (http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/virtbench) to try
to measure
S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> Hi;
>
> -rc6 fails with latest gcc 4.2 snapshot as following;
>
> CC [M] drivers/kvm/svm.o
> drivers/kvm/svm.c:206: warning: 'inject_db' defined but not used
> drivers/kvm/svm.c: In function 'svm_vcpu_run':
> drivers/kvm/kvm.h:560: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constra
Tim Chen wrote:
> I notice that when I am testing kvm, the clock on guest is running at
> twice the speed. Same thing also happen using qemu without kvm.
>
> I look at my wall clock when I issue the command "time sleep 30". When
> the command returns and report 30 sec has elasped, I found that ac
Tim Chen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 19:58 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> kvm only supports uniprocessor guests at this time.
>>
>>
>
> Thanks for the clarification. Is SMP support for guests
> expected soon?
>
For the next few weeks I plan to focus on stability, correctness
Jun Koi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am investigating the possibility of debugging guest kernel with KVM.
> Anybody may shed some lights into how KVM handles breakpoints?
>
> Suppose that we put a breakpoint (0xCC opcode in x86) into guest
> kernel. When the kernel hits the breakpoint, which one will handle
Tim Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did some testing of KVM on my woodcrest machine. And I found that
> building a 2.6.19 kernel with identical configuration takes 845 sec on a
> guest and 210 sec on the host. So the compile is about 4X slower on the
> guest :(
>
> The guest ran with 2.6.19 kernel and ho
Matthew Hall wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> kvm only supports uniprocessor guests at this time.
>>
>
> Out of interest, if/when
when.
> kvm supports smp guests aswell as hosts would
> the guest be presented with a multiple virtual or physical cpu's?
> Ie. If the guest has multiple vir
10 matches
Mail list logo
