Leslie Mann wrote:
> Avi:
>
> Leslie Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Fails.
>>
>> I notice that a lot of new code is related to pio. Seeing that it locks up
>> when
>> the VPN starts using the network, I sprinkled some printk's around and have
>> discovered that we enter an long runnin
on Mon Apr 09 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> I'm using the ondemand governor on my core duo laptop. Even when kvm
>> is taking 99% of the CPU, somehow instead of the ondemand governor
>> kicking it up to 2GHz, the CPU is still running at half speed. What's
>> up with that?
Avi:
Leslie Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fails.
>
> I notice that a lot of new code is related to pio. Seeing that it locks up
> when
> the VPN starts using the network, I sprinkled some printk's around and have
> discovered that we enter an long running (endless?) loop in kvm_run.
> ru
Here is the next pass of the patch with changes based on feedback.
I still have not converted over to kerneldoc format as I cannot find an example
anywhere yet, and the documentation under Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO
was a little vague. Pointers appreciated.
-Greg
---
KVM: Add irqdevi
>>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2007 at 2:47 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> The following is another patch that I broke out of the in- kernel- apic
>> patch
> that I sent earlier. This focuses purely on the irqdevice abstra
>>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2007 at 5:58 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> diff -- git a/drivers/kvm/kvm_irqdevice.h b/drivers/kvm/kvm_irqdevice.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..9c91d15
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/kvm/kvm_irqdevice.h
>>
* Avi Kivity ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte wrote:
> >
> >i was testing the gcc 4.3 against the latest git kernel, and got a
> >warning in your code (using -Wstrict-overflow=1)
> >
> >drivers/kvm/vmx.c: In function 'inject_rmode_irq':
> >drivers/kvm/vmx.c:1193: warning: as
Hi Avi,
I believe I have incorporated all of the changes requested. Please find the
result of that patch inline.
Note that I finally understand what you were getting at with the array of
objects thing. I didn't change it yet for the same reason that you mentioned:
reduction of churn. Howeve
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 10:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>> I'm a little puzzled by your response. Hmm...
>>>
>>> lguest's userspace network frontend does exactly as many copies as
>>> Ingo's in-host-kernel code. One from the Guest,
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 10:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > I'm a little puzzled by your response. Hmm...
> >
> > lguest's userspace network frontend does exactly as many copies as
> > Ingo's in-host-kernel code. One from the Guest, one to the Guest.
>
> kvm pvnet is
> If the git: and svn: protocols are blocked for you, I can try to make
them
>available through http.
>
That would be helpful, thanks!
-Xin
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsa
David Abrahams wrote:
> I'm using the ondemand governor on my core duo laptop. Even when kvm
> is taking 99% of the CPU, somehow instead of the ondemand governor
> kicking it up to 2GHz, the CPU is still running at half speed. What's
> up with that? Anybody know?
>
>
Strange. Does a simple
David Abrahams wrote:
> on Sun Apr 08 2007, "Dor Laor"
> wrote:
>
>
>>> http://rafb.net/p/SlXj4R45.html
>>>
>>> Is this normal? When I restarted KVM afterwards, it seemed to restart
>>> the installation process at a point when a real machine might have
>>> rebooted anyway.
>>>
>> This
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 08:36 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Avi,
>>>
>>> I don't think you've thought about this very hard. The receive copy is
>>> completely independent with whether the packet is going to the guest via
>>> a kernel
14 matches
Mail list logo
