Anthony Liguori wrote:
Attached patch implements lazy FPU save/restore for SVM. It's much
more conservative than my previous patch. We can now mark the guest
FPU as inactive whenever we want which will trigger CR0.TS to be set
in the guest's shadowed CR0.
Right now, we only mark the FPU
ymed wrote:
Hello!
I have recently tried to install XP 64 bit SP1 on KVM 16.
But Windows setup buzzed on text mode and screen: Setup is starting
Windows. Xp 32 bit runs on KVM 16 without any problems.
Does KVM support XP 64 bit?
Thank you very much!
64-bit Windows is not yet
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Howdy,
I had an idea for improving VMEXIT time by only saving/restoring
sys{enter,call,ret} MSRs when exiting from kernel space code since as
long as these instructions aren't executed on the host, everything
should be fine.
Yup.
This worked fine for
Rusty Russell wrote:
Hi all,
I note that Linux under kvm 20 doesn't use sysenter, while it did under
kvm 19. There's no sep in /proc/cpuinfo
x86info does report sep, but arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c has this to say:
/* SEP CPUID bug: Pentium Pro reports SEP but doesn't have
On Friday 20 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i'm pleased to announce release -v4 of the CFS patchset.
Hi Ingo, hi Avi, hi all,
I'm trying to use kvm-20 with cfs v4 and get a crash:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/local/kvm/bin/qemu -snapshot
/mnt/data/virtual/qemu/winxp.img
kvm_run: failed entry,
* Christian Hesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i'm pleased to announce release -v4 of the CFS patchset.
Hi Ingo, hi Avi, hi all,
I'm trying to use kvm-20 with cfs v4 and get a crash:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/local/kvm/bin/qemu -snapshot
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:17 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
Hi all,
I note that Linux under kvm 20 doesn't use sysenter, while it did under
kvm 19. There's no sep in /proc/cpuinfo
x86info does report sep, but arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c has this to say:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 4:42 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
The current code is geared towards using a user- mode (A)PIC. This patch
adds
an irqdevice abstraction, and implements a userint model to handle the
duties of the
hi,
I am trying to run unix like operating system (mainly meant for educational
purposes) on kvm called Unix Lite (http://www.unixlite.org/). It runs fine on
qemu but on kvm it gives the unhandled vm exit 0x9. This is caused by the
hardware task switch that is used in unix lite. The code
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 4:50 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
/*
+ * Signal that we have transitioned back to host mode
+ */
+spin_lock_irqsave(vcpu- irq.lock, irq_flags);
+vcpu- irq.guest_mode = 0;
+
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 4:54 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Adds an abstraction to the LAPIC logic so that we can later substitute it
for an in- kernel model.
This is overly abstracted. It's not like you can (on real
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 5:04 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Signed- off- by: Gregory Haskins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/kvm/Makefile |2
drivers/kvm/kernint.c | 168 +
drivers/kvm/kvm.h | 14
on Mon Apr 16 2007, David Abrahams
dave-UB3wUj7V41K5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/-AT-public.gmane.org wrote:
on Thu Apr 12 2007, David Abrahams
dave-UB3wUj7V41K5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/-AT-public.gmane.org wrote:
on Thu Apr 12 2007, Avi Kivity
avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w-AT-public.gmane.org wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
