Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:51:10PM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto:
>
>>> While doing repeated tests with the installer I ran into another
>>> (unrelated) problem. Sometimes the guest kernel hangs at boot at:
>>>
>>> NET: Registered protocol family 2
>>>
>>> with any kind
Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> Perhaps I miss something, but I dont see you initialize ncpus anywhere
> in the patch?
>
Good catch. Fixed.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
This SF.ne
Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote:
> So take this patch instead. It remove the verification for NULL value
> of memslot in mark_page_dirty().
>
Applied, thanks.
> I am trying to send patch in 2 format: .txt and .patch. If your mailer
> cannot see them as inline text, I guess that is my gmail problem , and
So now we can have SMP guest with KVM? Great!
One thing I dont understand: I dont see where you unlock vcpu[n].sipi_sem?
Thanks,
Jun
On 6/5/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> repository: /home/avi/kvm
> branch: master
> commit 61f2f77a6f11a08f06134c03e083713c78765509
> Author: Avi Kivit
Jun Koi wrote:
> So now we can have SMP guest with KVM? Great!
>
It's not done yet.
> One thing I dont understand: I dont see where you unlock
> vcpu[n].sipi_sem?
>
That's still cooking. I've written small pseudo apic which can issue
the sipi.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many argume
When in kernel device model is introduced, the guest interrupt status
may get changed when after it injected an IRQ and thus guest see a
messed interrupt state. This patch tries to disable irq at that window
to avoid the confusion.
Signed-off-by: Yaozu (Eddie) Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I want to try the balloon driver. Do we have it in any git tree?
The git tree I am having now only has master branch, and nothing else.
(Maybe the balloon driver is not working yet, but I am curious when
see the userspace code in user/)
Thanks,
Jun
-
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> When in kernel device model is introduced, the guest interrupt status
> may get changed when after it injected an IRQ and thus guest see a
> messed interrupt state. This patch tries to disable irq at that window
> to avoid the confusion.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaozu (Eddi
>Hi,
>
>I want to try the balloon driver. Do we have it in any git tree?
>
>The git tree I am having now only has master branch, and nothing else.
>
>(Maybe the balloon driver is not working yet, but I am curious when
>see the userspace code in user/)
>
>Thanks,
>Jun
You're welcome to test it, it
Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm testing the new Fedora7 under KVM. As you may know Fedora has
> migrated to the new libata drivers.
>
> ata_piix is unhappy with the PIIX IDE controller provided by QEmu/KVM:
>
>
>
[...]
> The following patch fixes the problem (i.e. ata_piix finds both the
Hi Eddie,
I think you are missing a key point here: irq.deferred is emulating the
atomic nature of an INTA (*) cycle. Once an interrupt is acknowledged, it is
atomically dispatched to the IDT (at least, this is my assumption..you intel
guys can set me straight if this is not true). There is
Note that we already disable interrupts before getting here once the APIC
series is applied, so this patch is either not necessary, or someone needs to
merge this into the lapic branch and clean it up.
Regards,
-Greg
>>> Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/05/07 7:32 AM >>>
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> W
On 6/5/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm testing the new Fedora7 under KVM. As you may know Fedora has
> > migrated to the new libata drivers.
> >
> > ata_piix is unhappy with the PIIX IDE controller provided by QEmu/KVM:
> >
> >
> >
>
> [...]
>
>
Luca wrote:
>
> Good point. I'm looking at bochs right now: the BIOS doesn't touch
> that bits. The 2 ports are enabled/disabled - using values from the
> config file - by the reset function of the emulated controller
> (iodev/pci_ide.cc), so they're doing the same thing I've done for
> QEMU.
> I'd
Shaohua Li wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a updated patch set of swap out kvm guest pages.Changes are:
> 1. refresh against to kvm-26
> 2. clean up shadow page handling to make gfn_to_page not be called
> within kmap_atomic/kunamp_atomic.
> 3. variant bug fixing. Now the patch is quite stable in my test.
>
Greg:
Hopefully, you are still online :-)
I think you are talking about different thing, it is not just a simple
queue, SDM chapter 25.7.1.1 has the answer for
how to handle IRQ injection failure. Per current V09, kvm_irqdevice_ack
will be invoked twice in case the previous injecti
Hi,
I have installed 2 VM (windows and Suse)using the default linux kernel
2.6.21 and kvm release package kvm-17 on Intel Xeon dual core system. Very
successful when running single VM instances but ran into trouble when
invoking 2 VMs simultaneously. The Qemu process does not allow multiple
ins
Hi,
I have installed 2 VM (windows and Suse)using the default linux
kernel 2.6.21 and kvm release package kvm-17 on Intel Xeon dual core
system. Very successful when running single VM instances but ran into
trouble when invoking 2 VMs simultaneously. The Qemu process does not
allow multiple
Still haven't got on the road yet ;)
I'm still pretty sure that what I said originally holds: That is, both are
covered, and neither are thrown away. When an injection fails, we call
kvm_vcpu_irq_push(), which puts the vector in irq.deferred. This will show up
as a pending interrupt in the i
>>> "Dong, Eddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/05/07 10:20 AM >>>
>
> If a guest OS *did* enable both PIC & APIC for a irq, both in
> the simplified
> approach (Xen) and V09 has same effect: exitirq get the
> priority and get
> injected. (BTW SDM doesn't explicitly say which one has priority).
>
I thin
This is a weird one. Using kvm27. I am able to install and run winxp 32
bit perfectly. The problem arises when I try and run my Vista Ultimate
upgrade. You cannot cold boot the upgrade and install on a blank drive
because when you enter the activation code, the software checks to make
sure ther
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 22:17 +0800, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Shaohua Li wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is a updated patch set of swap out kvm guest pages.Changes are:
> > 1. refresh against to kvm-26
> > 2. clean up shadow page handling to make gfn_to_page not be called
> > within kmap_atomic/kunamp_atomic.
> >
Hi Dor,
On 6/5/07, Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I want to try the balloon driver. Do we have it in any git tree?
> >
> >The git tree I am having now only has master branch, and nothing else.
> >
> >(Maybe the balloon driver is not working yet, but I am curious when
> >see the
Wayde Milas wrote:
> This is a weird one. Using kvm27. I am able to install and run winxp 32
> bit perfectly. The problem arises when I try and run my Vista Ultimate
> upgrade. You cannot cold boot the upgrade and install on a blank drive
> because when you enter the activation code, the softwar
24 matches
Mail list logo
