On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Chris Clayton wrote:
> > Forgot to cc this to the list, sorry
> > -- Forwarded Message --
> >
> > Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-31 seg fault
> > Date: Tuesday 24 July 2007
> > From: Chris Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Avi Kivity
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 17:09 -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/kvm/vmx.c | 71
> > +++-- 1 files
> changed, 58
> > insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> drivers/kvm/vmx.c | 71
> +++-- 1 files
changed, 58
> insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/kvm/vmx.c b/drivers/kvm/vmx.c
> index 96837d6..86
<>-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> htt
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/kvm/vmx.c | 71 +++--
1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/vmx.c b/drivers/kvm/vmx.c
index 96837d6..86f1eea 100644
--- a/drivers/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/kvm/kvm.h | 31
drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c | 26 +--
drivers/kvm/kvm_svm.h |3
drivers/kvm/svm.c | 394
drivers/kvm/vmx.c | 249 +++--
(Note the last "v3" I sent out was a duplicate v3...it should have been v4)
This series includes the following changes from v4(v3)
Patch #1: I have folded Rusty's cleanup in (thanks Rusty!)
Patch #2: Rebased on Rusty's changes
Patch #3: Dropped
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:53 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 14:45 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> OK, in anticipation that you would do it, I've done a trivial
> s/svm()/to-svm()/ and s/vmx()/to_vmx()/ patch and put my pa
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 07:56 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > While working with the -rt kernel, I have noticed a problem in KVM.
> > Specifically, when you stop a VM you sometimes get a "sleep while
> > atomic" oopses. It turns out that the issue is related to a
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 07:58 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > We need to provide locking around the current_vmcs/VMCS interactions to
> > protect against race conditions.
> >
> >
>
> We agreed the race was benign? Do you no longer think so?
No, I agree (see "0/3" note). I
Hi,
I've installed the latest version kvm-33 on my PC. All guests (tested
with several knoppix version and SuSE 10.1 install dvd image) hanging on
reboot. In the host syslog I found a lot of messages (>1000): "kernel:
kvm: unhandled wrmsr: 0xc083"
I've tested with the original kernel kvm modu
Put cpu feature detecting part in hardware_setup, and stored the vmcs
condition in global variable for further check.
Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/kvm/vmx.c | 145
1 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:39 +0900, Jun Koi wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> So with this patch, we no longer have limitation on the number of
> vcpus running in a VM?
Well, the #define needs to be changed, but that's a trivial matter.
If we want it really big, we should look at dynamic reallocation of the
Hi Rusty,
So with this patch, we no longer have limitation on the number of
vcpus running in a VM?
Thanks,
Jun
On 7/27/07, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:56 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > This patch converts the vcpus array in "struct kvm" to a linked list
>
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:56 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> This patch converts the vcpus array in "struct kvm" to a linked list
> of VCPUs
... and here's the version which leaves it as an array (of pointers).
Oops.
==
Dynamically allocate vcpus
This patch converts the vcpus array in "struct kvm"
15 matches
Mail list logo
