Hi,
After installing kvm-36, existing solaris 10 vm would crash during
booting up. New installation crashes also. With interactive GUI
installation, the vm would hang after X server comes up before language
can be selected. Mouse cursor would be stuck and without response. With
interactive text c
Hi,
Thanks guys. I'm trying Fedora 7 again. I tried to update kvm to the
latest, but configure complains about not finding gcc version 3. Is gcc 3
necessary to build kvm?
Thanks,
-G
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Spl
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:13:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like a
> "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside. And it is much
> more simple to use "qemu my_pc" than "qemu -c my_pc/config".
If you need th
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 22:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like a
> "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside. And it is much
> more simple to use "qemu my_pc" than "qemu -c my_pc/config".
You
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like
> a "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside.
I consider this a super downside.
"If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will use it [your
sof
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be
like
> > a "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside.
>
> I consider this a super downside.
>
> "If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will u
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 18:39:45 Laurent Vivier wrote:
> These patches split the emulator in two parts: one to decode the instruction,
> the other to execute it. The decode part is then called only when needed.
Is the same change done to the Xen version? It might be better to make
it easier to
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 20:52:36 Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> This patch set contains a set of virtualization transports for the 9p file
> system intended to provide a mechanism for guests to access a portion of the
> hosts name space without having to go through a virtualized network.
It migh
Hi Anthony,
I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like a
"black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside. And it is much
more simple to use "qemu my_pc" than "qemu -c my_pc/config".
Regards,
Laurent
--
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 16:05 -0300, Jorge Lucángeli Obes wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It makes little sense to pass a directory when you can pass a config
> > file and assume that the directory the config file is in is the CWD.
> >
> > For instance, if vm.cfg
On 8/31/07, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It makes little sense to pass a directory when you can pass a config
> file and assume that the directory the config file is in is the CWD.
>
> For instance, if vm.cfg contained just the command line arguments, you
> could have:
>
> MyImage/v
It makes little sense to pass a directory when you can pass a config
file and assume that the directory the config file is in is the CWD.
For instance, if vm.cfg contained just the command line arguments, you
could have:
MyImage/vm.cfg:-hda disk0.qcow -m 512
MyImage/disk0.qcow:
And t
Hi all,
The last time this issue was discussed, the executable-directory idea
gained more consensus than the snapshot-based idea. This patch
implements my perception of the first idea. Non-Windows for now, as I
can't test on a Windows system. Suggestions and constructive criticism
more than welcom
On 8/31/07, Jorge Lucángeli Obes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Folks,
> >
> > I've been trying to get kvm going, but I can't seem to find a stable distro
> > to test with. I've tried Fedora (which I've never liked anyway) and Ce
On 8/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Folks,
>
> I've been trying to get kvm going, but I can't seem to find a stable distro
> to test with. I've tried Fedora (which I've never liked anyway) and CentOS,
> but it crashes when installing w2k3. May I ask what distro y'al
Hi,
We have had several reports of users saying our product VirtualBox
crashes their (Linux) host. It turned out that KVM is responsible, because
it leaves the CPU in VMX root mode.
Doing this changes the way the cpu operates: updates to reserved bits in
control registers cause general protecti
16 matches
Mail list logo
