Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:37:43PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>>
After discussions with Anthony Liguori, it seems that the virtio
balloon can be made even simpler. Here's my attempt.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:37:43PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >Rusty Russell wrote:
> >>After discussions with Anthony Liguori, it seems that the virtio
> >>balloon can be made even simpler. Here's my attempt.
> >>
> >>Since the balloon requires Guest cooperation anyway, t
Hello,
This patch :
kvm: qemu: remove SIGUSR2 from io_sigset
Applied 15th Jan 2008 looks to kill I/O performance for me. As soon as I
revert it my VMs are much faster. I don't really use SMP for my guests,
perhaps this patch has made uniprocessor VMs slower ?
The issue occurs even when using RA
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
>> After discussions with Anthony Liguori, it seems that the virtio
>> balloon can be made even simpler. Here's my attempt.
>>
>> Since the balloon requires Guest cooperation anyway, there seems
>> little reason to force it to tell the Host when it wants to
Hello,
This patch :
kvm: qemu: remove SIGUSR2 from io_sigset
Applied 15th Jan 2008 looks to kill I/O performance for me. As soon as I
revert it my VMs are much faster. I don't really use SMP for my guests,
perhaps this patch made uniprocessor VMs slower ?
Regards,
Will Trives
--
Avi Kivity writes:
> Thanks; that's reassuring to know that it will work (at least on Intel).
Actually there are modern Intel systems which still have instable TSCs;
e.g. IBM Summit multi node systems and some others. So you should
still handle that case.
-Andi
-
Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 01:34:30PM +0900, Jun Koi wrote:
>> Sorry for my ignorance, but what is the effect of this patch? So
>> I can shutdown guest VM cleanly, or smt else??
> system_powerdown in the commmand monitor now simulates the pressing of
> the acpi power butto
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 12:20:56AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> I found a piix4 acpi spec update that says that the SCI interrupt is
> hardwired to IRQ9 and is active high. Linux knows about this and ignores
> the pci irq config for this function. With the following changes
Aahh, that's why Xen h
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> When it's more close to inclusion, I'd also post it to main qemu list.
> But right now, I'm just aiming at a first round around this draft.
>
> The attached patch is enough to make the notifications DEVICE_CHECK
> and EJECT reach the kernel. As far as I understa
