Amit Shah wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2008 17:01:46 Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I finally got it working.
>>>
>>> The problem was 32/64 bits issue. I'm so used to 64bits kernel and
>>> 32bits userland - not a single thought occured to me that this might be
>
On Sunday 10 February 2008 17:01:46 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > Ok, I finally got it working.
> >
> > The problem was 32/64 bits issue. I'm so used to 64bits kernel and
> > 32bits userland - not a single thought occured to me that this might be
> > problematic of some sort. I w
Hi,
I'm running a 32-bit Windows 2003 R2 guest with -smp 4 on a dual Xeon
5130 (Intel Core 2 Duo) server. The the installer hung when I tried to
install with -smp 4, but it went okay with just one CPU. After
installing, it runs fine with -smp 4 (ACPI Multiprocessor HAL).
It seems to be running re
From: Kay Hayen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 10/02/2008 17:59
To: Uri Lublin
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] KVM migration problem on Ubuntu
Hello Uri,
thanks for the reply, that is going to work for me. I am indeed trying to:
Ubuntu Hardy Development as Host, U
Hello Uri,
thanks for the reply, that is going to work for me. I am indeed trying to:
> Just to be clear, are you trying to upgrade you host or your guest (VM) ?
Yes.
> Please specify your Host CPU/OS and your guest OS.
Ubuntu Hardy Development as Host, Ubuntu Gutsy as Minimal,
kernel "linu
Paul Brook wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2008, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Paul Brook wrote:
>>
> as far as i remember it was used to address something with
> cpu_physical_memory_rw() probably related to &TARGET_PAGE_SIZE
> or ~TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
>
> the fact is that i dont k
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> >>> as far as i remember it was used to address something with
> >>> cpu_physical_memory_rw() probably related to &TARGET_PAGE_SIZE
> >>> or ~TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
> >>>
> >>> the fact is that i dont know if it ever fixed anything
> >>
On Saturday 09 February 2008 19:25:57 Uri Lublin wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kay Hayen
> Sent: Sat 09/02/2008 14:12
> To: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [kvm-devel] KVM migration problem on Ubuntu
>
> Hello people,
>
>
> I have a Ubuntu gutsy minimal VM made as a testi
Paul Brook wrote:
>>> as far as i remember it was used to address something with
>>> cpu_physical_memory_rw() probably related to &TARGET_PAGE_SIZE
>>> or ~TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
>>>
>>> the fact is that i dont know if it ever fixed anything
>>>
>> It fixes TARGET_PAGE_MASK, defined one line down
> > as far as i remember it was used to address something with
> > cpu_physical_memory_rw() probably related to &TARGET_PAGE_SIZE
> > or ~TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
> >
> > the fact is that i dont know if it ever fixed anything
>
> It fixes TARGET_PAGE_MASK, defined one line downscreen.
That doesn't reall
Bugs item #1890597, was opened at 2008-02-10 15:24
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1890597&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is the improved patchset which adds support for the Nested Paging
> feature of the AMD Barcelona and Phenom processors to KVM. The patch set
> was successfully install- and runtime-tested with various guest
> operating systems (64 bit, 32 bit legacy and 32 bit PAE
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> So what we would like to do, is instead of setting up vm86 mode for the
> guest to execute real mode, use x86_emulate() to just emulate the code.
> This means that we wouldn't be using the "vmlaunch" instruction when in
> real mode and instead would be doing an x86_emul
On Feb 10, 2008 2:29 AM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Current git for me (b1d0e4f535e10775cffde922208b49629169aeaa) doesn't
> let me build KVM. In fact, I don't seem to have *ANY* kvm-related
> symbols in my .config at all.
>
> I've verified that arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig was getting run by
Bob Tennent wrote:
> I'm experimenting with kvm on a Fedora 8 system. I've installed the
> necessary packages, have a suitable CPU etc. I'll eventually aim for
> a Windows guest, but am trying out a virtual Fedora 8 guest. When I
> try to install a Fedora guest, it threatens to wipe and re-partitio
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> From: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>
> Can you also add one for qemu-kvm-x86.c?
>
>
Sure, added.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Ok, I finally got it working.
>
> The problem was 32/64 bits issue. I'm so used to 64bits kernel and 32bits
> userland - not a single thought occured to me that this might be problematic
> of some sort. I was always trying 32bits kvm usermode tools with 64bits
> kernels.
Jerone Young wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # Date 1201818508 21600
> # Node ID 739668b2f1913a381899d82912517a6568b6f30c
> # Parent 5b553559aa641bf36b190541f775396ecdbf0e78
> Update Copyrights on PowerPC KVM Qemu code.
>
> I missed a copyright that needed
Hello list!
See subj.
I tried boot installed guest Opensuse 10.3 and it stops booting when
"-snapshot" and "-smp 2" options are enabled. With "-snapshot" and "-smp 1"
this guest OS work fine.
With guest Win2000 this options work fine.
My system is:
CPU: Core2Duo E6400
RAM: 2GB
Host OS: Opensuse 1
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 23:38 -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
>
>> A patch I submitted yesterday to use the call qemu_kvm_cpu_env() in
>> the dcr handles is not needed since in kvm_arch_post_kvm_run variable
>> cpu_single_env is set to env. So just use cpu_single_env to get en
Hi Dave.
>
> I've verified that arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig was getting run by putting some
> comments in it. It seems to me like just putting:
>
> config HAVE_KVM
> bool
>
> isn't letting anything come into my .config at all. I'm not sure why we
> do that, and then have:
>
>
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:24:01PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > config HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
> > def_bool X86_64
> >
> > -select HAVE_KVM
> > +config HAVE_KVM
> > + def_bool y
>
> i think it might be better to just move the select to aft
Izik Eidus wrote:
>>
>>> Index: qemu/cpu-all.h
>>> ===
>>> --- qemu.orig/cpu-all.h 2008-02-01 15:24:45.0 -0600
>>> +++ qemu/cpu-all.h 2008-02-01 15:28:48.0 -0600
>>> @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@
>>>
>>> /* page related s
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:57:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Very nice patchset; small, simple, and clean. Apart from the comments
>> I already posted, I'd like to avoid the term 'hap': I find it
>> non-descriptive, and it reminds me of another hypervisor. I suggest
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
