Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
And I would like to ask right and wrong to
implement the functionality in terms of need
and efficiency (scalability and time accuracy).
I think that for newer kernels we already have the desired accuracy.
We're not always good at exploiting
Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch breaks QEMU build when doing a 'make sync'. When you do a
top-level ./configure, libkvm is built with kerneldir pointing to
kvm-userspace/kernel/include. While linux/kvm.h is present there,
there isn't a linux/compiler.h.
The host kernelpath isn't
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Don't compile kvm_*_pit() on architectures whose currently supported
platforms do not contain a PIT.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/libkvm/libkvm.h b/libkvm/libkvm.h
--- a/libkvm/libkvm.h
+++ b/libkvm/libkvm.h
@@ -539,6 +539,7 @@
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
This patch solves annoying qemu build breakage hitting PowerPC around
struct kvm_pit_state, so that's another vote in favor...
I have an updated version of the patch but it's breaking the build b/c
something fouled up right now with
Ryota OZAKI wrote:
Hi all,
Current 'make clean' deletes config.mak files so
that we have to ./configure again after doing that.
This behavior is different from that of standard
'make clean'.
This patch introduces 'make distclean' to delete
config.mak files instead of 'make clean',
Anthony Liguori wrote:
If we're going to mod the kernel, how about a mmap this part of their
address
space and having the kernel keep the mappings in sync. But I think that if
we want to get speed, we should probably be doing the copy between address
spaces in-kernel so we
Rock her world with your 9 inch monster.
http://www.neurues.com/
Amateur videos for you
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
Avi Kivity wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 05:01:09PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
This is the first release of network drivers for Windows guests running
on a kvm host. The drivers are intended for Windows 2000 and Windows XP
32-bit. kvm-61 or later is
Heiko Carstens wrote:
What you've done with dup_mm() is probably the brute-force way that I
would have done it had I just been trying to make a proof of concept or
something. I'm worried that there are a bunch of corner cases that
haven't been considered.
What if someone else is poking
Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
2008/3/19, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
2008/3/19, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
2008/3/16, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The -vnc switch, so there's no local X server. A remote X server should
be fine as
On Friday 21 March 2008 01:11:35 Anthony Liguori wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
There are three possible solutions:
1) Just offer the lowest common denominator to both sides (ie. no
features). This is what I do with lguest in these patches.
2) Offer something and handle the case where one
Avi Kivity wrote:
I see the same issue too now, and am investigating.
The attached patch should fix the issue. It is present in 2.6.25-rc6
only, and not in kvm.git, which is why few people noticed it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
diff --git
Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Hi
During execution of qemu I've got this crash:
#0 0x00407a29 in qemu_mod_timer (ts=0x2e8cf90,
expire_time=130685351465) at /usr/src/debug/kvm-63/qemu/vl.c:1073
#1 0x00425590 in pcnet_ioport_writew (opaque=0x0,
addr=1836332585, val=8090216)
at
Приглашаем Вас принять участие в НОВОМ курсе:
Новое в правовом регулировании оформления
прав на объекты недвижимости.
Федеральный закон
О
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
This patch solves annoying qemu build breakage hitting PowerPC around
struct kvm_pit_state, so that's another vote in favor...
I have an updated version of the patch but it's breaking the build b/c
Qemu device emulation for timers might be inaccurate and
causes coalescing of several irq into one. It happens when the
load on the host is high and the guest did not manage to ack the
previous irq. By get/set request irq commands the device won't issue
another irq before the previous one has been
Hi Avi,
If you use the dyntick clock option (the default, IIRC), and a newer
host kernel, then the kernel provides high-resolution timers, very
likely using HPET internally or some other high resolution clock and
event source.
I see. The dyntick clock seems to be more scalable than
the
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 12:15 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Can you convert the page tables at a later time without doing a
wholesale replacement of the mm? It should be a bit easier to keep
people off the pagetables than keep their grubby mitts off the mm
itself.
Yes, as far as I can
各位老总：您们好！
诚祝：您们在2008年里；有鼠不尽的快乐！鼠不尽的收获！鼠不尽的钞票！
鼠不尽的幸福！鼠不尽的美满生活！愿：您们阖家欢乐！幸福安康！
我是（深圳市珊湖岛进出口有限公司）的负责人；可以提供：出口报关单，
核销单等等一系列手续；代理：出口报关，商检，境内外运输..等等；还可
各位老总：您们好！
诚祝：您们在2008年里；有鼠不尽的快乐！鼠不尽的收获！鼠不尽的钞票！
鼠不尽的幸福！鼠不尽的美满生活！愿：您们阖家欢乐！幸福安康！
我是（深圳市珊湖岛进出口有限公司）的负责人；可以提供：出口报关单，
核销单等等一系列手续；代理：出口报关，商检，境内外运输..等等；还可
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 04:56:50PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:37:00AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
This is not the final put_page().
Remote TLB's are flushed here, after rmap_remove:
+ if (nuked)
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 00:32 +0900, Ryota OZAKI wrote:
Hi Avi,
If you use the dyntick clock option (the default, IIRC), and a newer
host kernel, then the kernel provides high-resolution timers, very
likely using HPET internally or some other high resolution clock and
event source.
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 16:19 +, Paul Brook wrote:
On Sunday 23 March 2008, Dor Laor wrote:
--- a/qemu/hw/irq.c
+++ b/qemu/hw/irq.c
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct IRQState {
int n;
};
+uint32_t qemu_irq_acked[NR_IRQ_WORDS];
This is absolute rubbish. The whole point of the
2008/3/23, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Avi Kivity wrote:
I see the same issue too now, and am investigating.
The attached patch should fix the issue. It is present in 2.6.25-rc6
only, and not in kvm.git, which is why few people noticed it.
Hi
Tested - and actually seeing no
On Sunday 23 March 2008, Dor Laor wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 16:19 +, Paul Brook wrote:
On Sunday 23 March 2008, Dor Laor wrote:
--- a/qemu/hw/irq.c
+++ b/qemu/hw/irq.c
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct IRQState {
int n;
};
+uint32_t qemu_irq_acked[NR_IRQ_WORDS];
Avi Kivity wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Don't compile kvm_*_pit() on architectures whose currently supported
platforms do not contain a PIT.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/libkvm/libkvm.h b/libkvm/libkvm.h
--- a/libkvm/libkvm.h
+++ b/libkvm/libkvm.h
26 matches
Mail list logo
