[kvm-devel] 2008年香港春季电子产品展

2007-11-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
寄至我会。 2、定金交付后填写:A、《中国内地馆参展表格》、B、《网上/产品杂志推广申请表》、C、《3张产品照片》主办单位免费为每家展商提供网上及杂志广告推广宣传,展位确认前务必提交上述表格与图片资料。 注:(主办单位要求:凡是老客户继续参展不能扩大展位规模;新客户参展只能提供1个9平米展位。)。 六、报名表等相关详细资料敬请联络广州招展处: 电 话:020-82340812 82341085 传 真:020-82341085 联系人: 李 ��13268068446[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-16 fails to compile on Kubuntu Edgy

2007-03-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> configure should compile the module as long as you don't specify > --with-patched-kernel. Ok, that's a misstatement. configure wouldn't compile the module, just set the makefiles to do so. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influe

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-16 fails to compile on Kubuntu Edgy

2007-03-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/18/07, Martin Kaufmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 3/17/07, Martin Kaufmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I tried to compile kvm-16 on Kubuntu Edgy - so far unsuccessfully. The > >&g

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-16 fails to compile on Kubuntu Edgy

2007-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/17/07, Martin Kaufmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I tried to compile kvm-16 on Kubuntu Edgy - so far unsuccessfully. The > configure succeeds but the make process fails with the following output: > [snip] > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-h

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-13

2007-02-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/19/07, Omar Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > That does not explain why the change you made (from ?= to :=) made any > > difference. Could you send a full log of ./configure && make &&a

Re: [kvm-devel] paravirtualization & cr3-cache feature

2007-02-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Why so many vm switches? First up, a typical I/O system maxes at > >about 1Gb/s, right? That would be a gigabit NIC, or striped RAID, or > >something like that. This suggests an average of only about 300 > >bytes/transfer, to get >150k individual transfers per second? I > >thought block I/O

Re: [kvm-devel] paravirtualization & cr3-cache feature

2007-02-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Intel is indeed slower than AMD with this one. > > I didn't measure such roundtrip specifically. We usually see that the > > VMETNRY/VMEXIT cycle limits our performance (for io/mmio,..) > > On Intel core duo we cannot get more than 150k-200k VMEXITS per second > > for regular guest doing extens

Re: [kvm-devel] paravirtualization

2007-02-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/12/07, Omar Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The paravirtualization announcement by Ingo Molnar said that: > > - it provides an ad-hoc paravirtualization hypercall API between a Linux > guest and a Linux host. (this will be replaced with a proper > hypercall later on

Re: [kvm-devel] patch to respect kerneldir when building kernel modules

2007-02-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Currently the kerneldir option to configure is ignored by the kernel/Makefile This patch fixes that, so you can build modules for your new kernel before booting with it. I'd put the line in the wrong place, this is better.

[kvm-devel] patch to respect kerneldir when building kernel modules

2007-02-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Currently the kerneldir option to configure is ignored by the kernel/Makefile This patch fixes that, so you can build modules for your new kernel before booting with it. kvm-should-respect-configured-kerneldir.patch Description: Binary data --

[kvm-devel] can KVM do pci-mapping like xen?

2007-02-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/5/07, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mathijs Kwik wrote: > > Hello, > > > > One of the features of xen that I find really interesting is the > > ability to "map" pci slots straight to the guest OS. > > > > I just recently

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Fix kvm-svn/kernel build on 32-bit

2007-02-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does kvm try to support 64-bit guests on a 32-bit host kernel? (64-bit CPU of course) It looks to me like this patch might prevent that scenario. On 2/3/07, Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Build currently fails with x86. > > Index: ke