Luca wrote:
> On 6/19/07, Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've tried to diff kvm-28 qemu directory with qemu 0.9.0 and I see that
>> some files in the kvm sources have the content of the file duplicated,
>> f.ex. qemu/hw/mips_int.
Hello,
I've tried to diff kvm-28 qemu directory with qemu 0.9.0 and I see that
some files in the kvm sources have the content of the file duplicated,
f.ex. qemu/hw/mips_int.c has it's own content twice in the kvm tree, it
only has it once in qemu as it should be. Look for the include
directive
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Baruch Even wrote:
>> I'm using KVM 28 and when I'm trying to reboot the guest vm kvm fails
>> with the following message:
>>
>>
>
> Can you be more specific as to what you're doing? what host cpu,
> bitness, guest
I'm using KVM 28 and when I'm trying to reboot the guest vm kvm fails
with the following message:
exception 13 (0)
rax 00c0 rbx rcx rdx
0600
rsi rdi rsp rbp
r8 00
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Baruch Even wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> What do peoples do/think about the permissions for /dev/kvm?
>>
>> I'm the maintainer for the Debian package and currently the package uses
>> a group to control access, for no good reason reall
Hello,
What do peoples do/think about the permissions for /dev/kvm?
I'm the maintainer for the Debian package and currently the package uses
a group to control access, for no good reason really. I've seen that
kqemu in Debian simply uses 0666 permissions and consider doing the same
for kvm. I
* Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070402 00:43]:
> >
> >A user just submitted a bug report against the kvm-18 debian package.
> >You can find the bug report at
> >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=417151
> >
> >The user has a default route with extra features and the kvm-ifup
> script
A user just submitted a bug report against the kvm-18 debian package.
You can find the bug report at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=417151
The user has a default route with extra features and the kvm-ifup script
fails for him, his default route looks like:
default via 10.0.0.138
I've had an oops when running kvm-18 on my dual core intel laptop. This
happened when I was installing Debian Etch with a net-install, the crash
happened when it was working to download and install packages from the
network. I've used a tap device bridged to my ethernet device.
The oops follows, l
I've packaged version 3 and uploaded it to my space at
http://people.debian.org/~baruch/kvm/ I've also uploaded it to Debian
but it will take a while before it really goes in, assuming no problems
are found.
Cheers,
Baruch
-
* Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061115 10:00]:
> Baruch Even wrote:
>
>
> >>My current tree has fixes for most of the problems. I'll look at the clean
> >>targets (why are they necessary for packaging?)
> >>
> >
> >Some of the p
* Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061115 09:50]:
> Baruch Even wrote:
> >Avi,
> >
> >Can you please decide on a normal version number for KVM? I currently
> >use 0.0.2 in order to be able to use later a proper version number, If
> >I'd use 2 now than a
Avi,
Can you please decide on a normal version number for KVM? I currently
use 0.0.2 in order to be able to use later a proper version number, If
I'd use 2 now than any other sane version later such as 1.0 will be
lower and I'll have to use a prefix to fix that. It would be nice if you
could just
I've created the packages for Debian, for now I haven't uploaded them to
the Archive, I'l wait for the next revision to clean up some of the
packaging issues.
The instructions for now are:
Go to http://people.debian.org/~baruch/kvm and download all the *.deb
files.
apt-get install module-assista
As part of the Debian package I must know which parts of the code to
attribute to whom and what license applies to each part. I've noticed
that the code in the user/ directory has no copyright statement or
license. Can someone clarify that?
The management_services also has no attribution and licen
* Simon Kagstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061114 11:30]:
> At Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:50:23 +0200,
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > Baruch Even wrote:
> > > Can the Qemu built with KVM support run without KVM? Froma quick perusal
> > > of the kvm.patch it seems tha
* Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061114 10:46]:
> Baruch Even wrote:
> >What are the plans with regard to merging the needed qemu changes
> >upstream? It would be nice to be able to package the kernel module and
> >know that everything else will just work.
> >
Can the Qemu built with KVM support run without KVM? Froma quick perusal
of the kvm.patch it seems that there are places where USE_KVM implies a
qemu-panic without any runtime conditionals.
I'd like to push the KVM patches to Debian Qemu and need to know if they
need to create new executables or j
Hi,
I got KVM to work on Debian just now with a few problems:
To install all needed dependencies:
apt-get install libuuid-dev gcc-3.4 libsdl1.2-dev zlib1g-dev
./configure didn't work for me as it didn't find the gcc-3.4 and uname
-i failed to work:
sed -i -e 's/$(uname -i)/i386/' configure
./co
19 matches
Mail list logo
