> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Lameter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 2:50 PM
> To: Caitlin Bestler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject:
Christoph Lameter wrote
>
> > Merely mlocking pages deals with the end-to-end RDMA semantics.
> > What still needs to be addressed is how a fastpath interface
> > would dynamically pin and unpin. Yielding pins for short-term
> > suspensions (and flushing cached translations) deals with the
> > res
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Lameter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 10:46 AM
> To: Caitlin Bestler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject:
Christoph Lameter asked:
>
> What does it mean that the "application layer has to be determine what
> pages are registered"? The application does not know which of its
pages
> are currently in memory. It can only force these pages to stay in
> memory if their are mlocked.
>
An application that a
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Lameter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 2:49 PM
> To: Caitlin Bestler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>
> > So suspend/resume to re-arrange pages is one thing. Suspend/resume to cover
> > swapping out pages so they can be reallocated is an exercis
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Steve Wise wrote:
>
> > Note that for T3, this involves suspending _all_ rdma connections that are
> in
> > the same PD as the MR being remapped. This is because the driver doesn't
> know
> >
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 09:09:08AM -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
> >> Note that for T3, this involves suspending _all_ rdma connections that are
> >> in the same PD as the MR being remapped. This is becaus
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 14 June 2007, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>>
>> Why not simply adopt the policy that if the IOMMU does not meet the
>> security requirements of the Hypervisor then it is not an IOMMU as
>> far as the Hypervisor is concerned?
>>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>>
>>> It can be done, but you'd also need a passthrough for the IOMMU in
>>> that case, and you get a potential security hole: if a malicious
>>> guest is smart enough to figure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sunday 10 June 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> - PCI (or your favorite HW bus) passthrough, for your favorite
>>> oddball device (e.g., crypto-accelerators).
>>>
>> Won't all high-bandwidth traffic be through dma, bypassing virtio?
>
> It can be done, but you'd also ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
