> "Avi" == Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Avi> kvm-devel doesn't do manual moderation. If vger has the
Avi> infrastructure, I don't see why you can't continue doing this on
Avi> kvm-ppc-devel.
Please don't do this for the kvm-ia64 list either.
Avi> btw, we can probably shorten the n
Hi,
This one fixes a segfault problem I am seeing on ia64 due to the
malloc'ed address being truncated to 32 bit.
Cheers,
Jes
Include qemu-common.h for the prototype for qemu_mallocz to avoid
the being truncated to 32 bit.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> I wasn't suggesting we shouldn't have both interfaces, merely
>> questioning why adding what to me seems like an unnecessary performance
>> hit for the classic case of the call.
>
> I don't mind how many interfaces there are, so long as there only needs
> to be one p
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>From 5c70c038c57190144390ae9d30c3d06afba103d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiantao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:59:30 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add kvm sal/pal virtulization support.
>
> Some sal/pal calls would be traped to kvm for vir
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>From 0d698efed15759b49e78adcef085feda0a14a175 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiantao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:57:09 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64: Add optimization for some virtulization
> faults
>
> optvfault.S Add optimization for some pe
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>From 6b731c15afa8cec84f16408c421c286f1dd1b7d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiantao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:45:40 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add TLB virtulization support.
>
> vtlb.c includes tlb/VHPT virtulization.
> Signed-off-by:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Jes Sorensen wrote:
> This change has been on the x86 side for ages, and not even Ingo made a
> peep about it ;)
Mmmm, last time I looked, x86 didn't scale to any interesting number
of CPUs :-)
>> Why not keep smp_call_function() the way it was
Hi Xiantao,
More comments.
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>From 696b9eea9f5001a7b7a07c0e58514aa10306b91a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiantao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:51:36 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add head files for kvm/ia64
>
> ia64_regs: some defintions for
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>From 62895ff991d48398a77afdbf7f2bef127e802230 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiantao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:49:57 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: IA64: Add kvm arch-specific core code for
> kvm/ia64.
>
> kvm_ia64.c is created to handle kvm ia6
Hi Xiantao,
Some more nit-picking, though some of this is a bit more important
to fixup.
Cheers,
Jes
> +typedef struct thash_data {
Urgh! argh! Please avoid typedefs unless you really need them, see
Chapter 5 of Documentation/CodingStyle for details.
> diff --git a/include/asm-ia64/kvm_host.h
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>From 697d50286088e98da5ac8653c80aaa96c81abf87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiantao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:50:24 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64: Implement smp_call_function_mask for ia64
>
> This function provides more flexible interface
Hi Xiantao,
I general I think the code in this patch is fine. I have a couple of
nit-picking comments:
> + if (target_mask&0x1) {
The formatting here isn't quite what most of the kernel does. It would
be better if you added spaces so it's a little easier to read, ie:
if (target_mask
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Hi Xiantao,
>>
>> If you could put up the patches somewhere, I could
>> help you clean them up and push them. I would prefer not
>> to wait until they appear in Linus' tree if possible.
>
> Hi, Jes
>
ree if possible.
Cheers,
Jes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2008年1月25日 2:53
> To: Jes Sorensen
> Cc: Zhang, Xiantao; kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] ia64 kernel patches?
>
> * Jes Sorensen ([EMAIL
Hi,
Trying to browse the list archives, but both gmane and sourcefrog's
interfaces are really painful to deal with.
So, any chance someone could point me at the current ia64 KVM kernel
patches? I notice they are not yet in Avi's tree.
Cheers,
Jes
15 matches
Mail list logo
