Hi,
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Javier Guerra wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 May 2008, Javier Guerra wrote:
> > > What about Lua? (http://www.lua.org)
> > >
> > > it started up
Hi,
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Javier Guerra wrote:
> What about Lua? (http://www.lua.org)
>
> it started up as a configuration language, and evolved into a full
> programming language, while remaining _very_ light (less than 200K
> with all libraries), and wonderfully easy to embed into C programs.
Hi,
On Wed, 14 May 2008, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> What I'd love, though, but expect others will consider bloat, is that
> files are passed through cpp before interpreting.
This will add a dependency to a developer's tool on an application that
has not much to do with development for most use
Hi,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > > I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like
> > > a "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside.
> > >
> >
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like
> a "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside.
I consider this a super downside.
"If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will use it [your
sof
