On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:35:54 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:35:55 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:35:53 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # Date 1210115129 -7200
> # Node ID d60d200565abde6a8ed45271e53cde9c5c75b426
> # Parent c5badbefeee07518d9d1acca13e94c981420317c
> invalidate_page
On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:35:51 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel &l
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:16:16 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > The VM shouldn't break if try_to_unmap doesn't actually make the page
> > freeable for whatever reason. Permanent pins shouldn't happen anyway,
>
> VM is livelo
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:10:50 +0200
Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
What prevents another CPU from freeing newpage while we run through
the start of replace_page() ?
--
All rights reversed.
-
This SF.net email is s
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:09:29 +0200
Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
All rights reversed.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challe
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:05:53 +0200
Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i added 2 new functions to the kernel
> one:
> page_wrprotect() make the page as read only by setting the ptes point to
> it as read only.
> second:
> replace_page() - replace the pte mapping related to vm area between two
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:52:04 +0100
Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
All rights reversed.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:24:18 +0100
Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my basic initial patch I only track the tlb flushes which should be
> the minimum required to have a nice linux-VM controlled swapping
> behavior of the KVM gphysical memory.
I have a vaguely related question on
Avi Kivity wrote:
> dyntick-enabled guest:
> - reduce the load on the host when the guest is idling
> (currently an idle guest consumes a few percent cpu)
You do not need dynticks for this actually. Simple no-tick-on-idle
like Xen has works well enough.
While you're modifying the timer code,
11 matches
Mail list logo