Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> This version fixes a wrong identifier (%0 instead of %1) and makes
> things work without touching the stack. This works by using %esi as
> backup-register for %ebx. It furthermore moves "function" directly to
> eax, without relying on gcc optimizations to realize this.
On Feb 21, 2008, at 10:14 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
Hi,
I found that on kvm-61 the cpuid in the guest was reported
incorrectly
when qemu-kvm was compiled with gcc-4.1 or 4.3.
This resulted in linux-64bit not booting,
On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
Hi,
I found that on kvm-61 the cpuid in the guest was reported
incorrectly
when qemu-kvm was compiled with gcc-4.1 or 4.3.
This resulted in linux-64bit not booting, complaining that it is not
running on a 64-bit machine
Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that on kvm-61 the cpuid in the guest was reported incorrectly
> when qemu-kvm was compiled with gcc-4.1 or 4.3.
>
> This resulted in linux-64bit not booting, complaining that it is not
> running on a 64-bit machine.
>
> Symptom: Unexpected behaviour after t
Hi,
I found that on kvm-61 the cpuid in the guest was reported incorrectly
when qemu-kvm was compiled with gcc-4.1 or 4.3.
This resulted in linux-64bit not booting, complaining that it is not
running on a 64-bit machine.
Symptom: Unexpected behaviour after the assembly snippet.
Solution: New as
