Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> According to privious decisions, mmu code should be moved to arch.
>
> >From 43a629932b6babcbf2af75299192c1d77c2393d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:16:40 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: MMU split for portabilit
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> According to privious decisions, mmu code should be moved to arch.
>
>> From 43a629932b6babcbf2af75299192c1d77c2393d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
>> 2001
> From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:16:40 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: MMU split for portabi
According to privious decisions, mmu code should be moved to arch.
>From 43a629932b6babcbf2af75299192c1d77c2393d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:16:40 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: MMU split for portability.
Since mmu code is very arch-de