Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:41:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
While aging is not too hard to do, I don't think it would add much in
practice; we rarely observe mmu shadow pages being recycled due to
memory pressure. So
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:41:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>
> >>While aging is not too hard to do, I don't think it would add much in
> >>practice; we rarely observe mmu shadow pages being recycled due to
> >>memory pressure. So this is mostly helpful for preventing
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>> While aging is not too hard to do, I don't think it would add much in
>> practice; we rarely observe mmu shadow pages being recycled due to
>> memory pressure. So this is mostly helpful for preventing a VM from
>> pinning memory when under severe memory pressure, wh
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:28:43PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:13:41PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> >
> >> this patch simply register the mmu cache with the shrinker.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Izik,
> >
> > Nice.
> >
> > I think you want some sort of
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:13:41PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
>
>> this patch simply register the mmu cache with the shrinker.
>>
>
> Hi Izik,
>
> Nice.
>
> I think you want some sort of aging mechanism here. Walk through all
> translations of a shadow page clearing t
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:23:23AM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:13:41PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> >
> >>this patch simply register the mmu cache with the shrinker.
> >>
> >
> >Hi Izik,
> >
> Hello Marcelo,
>
> >Nice.
> >
> >I think you wa
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Izik Eidus wrote:
>> this patch simply register the mmu cache with the shrinker.
>
> Please inline patches in the future as it makes it easier to review.
I knew this time will come when ppl will force me to send patchs inline
(will happen next time )... :)
> The impleme
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:13:41PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
>
>> this patch simply register the mmu cache with the shrinker.
>>
>
> Hi Izik,
>
Hello Marcelo,
> Nice.
>
> I think you want some sort of aging mechanism here.
well it is long time in the todo list
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:13:41PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> this patch simply register the mmu cache with the shrinker.
Hi Izik,
Nice.
I think you want some sort of aging mechanism here. Walk through all
translations of a shadow page clearing the referenced bit of all
mappings it holds (and mo
Izik Eidus wrote:
> this patch simply register the mmu cache with the shrinker.
Please inline patches in the future as it makes it easier to review.
The implementation looks good and I think it's a good idea.
One is that there is one shrinker for all VMs but you run through the
list of VMs in
this patch simply register the mmu cache with the shrinker.
0004-KVM-register-the-kvm-mmu-cache-with-the-shrinker.patch
Description: application/mbox
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microso
11 matches
Mail list logo
