* On Wednesday 09 Apr 2008 17:41:10 Glauber Costa wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
* On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote:
Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, applied.
Going forward,
Amit Shah wrote:
* On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote:
Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, applied.
Going forward, we're going to use the in-kernel approach for interrupt
Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
irqhook/irqhook_main.c | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/irqhook/irqhook_main.c b/irqhook/irqhook_main.c
index
* On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote:
Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, applied.
Going forward, we're going to use the in-kernel approach for interrupt
injection (which already has