Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] use NR_IRQS for irq count

2008-04-10 Thread Amit Shah
* On Wednesday 09 Apr 2008 17:41:10 Glauber Costa wrote: Amit Shah wrote: * On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote: Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, applied. Going forward,

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] use NR_IRQS for irq count

2008-04-09 Thread Glauber Costa
Amit Shah wrote: * On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote: Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, applied. Going forward, we're going to use the in-kernel approach for interrupt

[kvm-devel] [PATCH] use NR_IRQS for irq count

2008-04-08 Thread Glauber Costa
Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- irqhook/irqhook_main.c | 16 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/irqhook/irqhook_main.c b/irqhook/irqhook_main.c index

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] use NR_IRQS for irq count

2008-04-08 Thread Amit Shah
* On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote: Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, applied. Going forward, we're going to use the in-kernel approach for interrupt injection (which already has