Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!

2007-11-13 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Amit Shah wrote: > Glauber, are you planning on consolidating the dma_ops structure for 32- and > 64-bit? 32-bit doesn't currently have a dma_mapping_ops structure, which > makes paravirtualizing DMA access difficult on 32-bit. I think it's a good idea. While I haven't worked out the details y

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!

2007-11-13 Thread Glauber de Oliveira Costa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Amit Shah escreveu: > On Saturday 10 November 2007 00:12:41 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. >> We didn't get that many comments from the last time, >> so it should be probably almost r

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!

2007-11-12 Thread Amit Shah
On Saturday 10 November 2007 00:12:41 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > Hey folks, > > Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. > We didn't get that many comments from the last time, > so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! > > >From the last version, the most notable changes

[kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!

2007-11-09 Thread Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering conce